Forbes Thomas A, McMinn Alissa, Crawford Nigel, Leask Julie, Danchin Margie
a Department of Nephrology ; Royal Children's Hospital ; Parkville , Victoria , Australia.
b SAEFVIC and Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group; Murdoch Children's Research Institute ; Parkville , VIC Australia.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(12):2895-903. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1070997. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is an issue of global concern. The quality of communication between healthcare providers and parents can influence parental immunization acceptance. We aimed to describe immunization uptake following specialist immunization clinic (SIC) consultation for Australian children of VH parents as a cohort, and according to pre-clinic parental position on immunization. At a single tertiary pediatric SIC (RCH, Melbourne) a retrospective descriptive study classified VH families according to 3 proposed parental positions on immunization at initial clinic attendance. Immunization status at follow up was ascertained via the Australian Children's Immunization Register and National HPV Program Register and compared between groups. Of the VH cohort, 13/38 (34%) families were classified as hesitant, 21 (55%) as late/selective vaccinators and 4 (11%) as vaccine refusers. Mean follow up post-SIC attendance was 14.5 months. For the overall VH cohort, the majority chose selective immunization (42%) following SIC consultation. When analyzed by pre-clinic parental position on immunization, there was a trend for hesitant families to proceed with full immunization, selective families to continue selective immunization and refusing families to remain unimmunised (p < 0.0001). The most commonly omitted vaccines were hepatitis B (66%) and Haemophilus influenzae type B (55%), followed by the meningococcal C conjugate vaccine (53%) and measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (53%). Immunization outcome appears to correlate with pre-clinic parental position on immunization for the majority of families attending a SIC in Australia, with selective immunization the most common outcome. Tailored communication approaches based on parental position on immunization may optimise clinic resources and engagement of families, but require prospective research evaluation.
疫苗犹豫是一个全球关注的问题。医疗服务提供者与家长之间的沟通质量会影响家长对免疫接种的接受程度。我们旨在描述澳大利亚疫苗犹豫家长的子女在专科免疫诊所(SIC)咨询后作为一个队列的免疫接种情况,并根据诊所前家长在免疫接种方面的立场进行描述。在一家三级儿科SIC(墨尔本皇家儿童医院)进行的一项回顾性描述性研究,根据首次就诊时家长在免疫接种方面提出的3种立场对疫苗犹豫家庭进行分类。通过澳大利亚儿童免疫登记册和国家人乳头瘤病毒计划登记册确定随访时的免疫接种状况,并在各群体之间进行比较。在疫苗犹豫队列中,13/38(34%)的家庭被归类为犹豫型,21(55%)为延迟/选择性接种者,4(11%)为疫苗拒绝者。SIC就诊后的平均随访时间为14.5个月。对于整个疫苗犹豫队列,大多数人在SIC咨询后选择了选择性免疫接种(42%)。按诊所前家长在免疫接种方面的立场进行分析时,犹豫家庭有进行全面免疫接种的趋势,选择性家庭继续进行选择性免疫接种,拒绝家庭仍未接种(p<0.0001)。最常遗漏的疫苗是乙型肝炎疫苗(66%)和B型流感嗜血杆菌疫苗(55%),其次是C群脑膜炎球菌结合疫苗(53%)和麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹疫苗(53%)。对于在澳大利亚参加SIC的大多数家庭来说,免疫接种结果似乎与诊所前家长在免疫接种方面的立场相关,选择性免疫接种是最常见的结果。基于家长在免疫接种方面的立场量身定制的沟通方式可能会优化诊所资源和家庭参与度,但需要前瞻性研究评估。