Mukha Rajiv Paul, Kumar Santosh, Kekre N S
Department of Urology, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore - 632 004, India.
Indian J Urol. 2010 Jan-Mar;26(1):133-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.60463.
Prostate cancer has now become one of the leading types of cancer in urban India. It is now the third most common cancer in Delhi. As we advance in health care with the resultant increase in longevity, we will be seeing more of advanced carcinoma prostate. Since the early 1980.s, there have been many trials on MAB. However, the question remains whether these agents actually make a difference? The role of MAB is probably limited to the prevention of the beta are reaction in patients on LHRH agonists. The non steroidal antiandrogens have a marginal benefit of increased overall survival by approximately 3% to 5% at 5 ve years. There may be a role for MAB in patients with metastatic carcinoma of prostate, low volume metastases, patients with M 1 disease with absence of metastases in the skull, ribs, long bones, and soft tissues excluding lymph nodes.
前列腺癌现已成为印度城市中主要的癌症类型之一。它目前是德里第三常见的癌症。随着我们在医疗保健方面的进步以及由此带来的寿命延长,我们将会看到更多的晚期前列腺癌。自20世纪80年代初以来,已经有许多关于雄激素剥夺疗法(MAB)的试验。然而,问题仍然是这些药物是否真的有作用?MAB的作用可能仅限于预防使用促性腺激素释放激素(LHRH)激动剂患者的β-精浆反应。非甾体类抗雄激素药物在5年时总体生存率提高约3%至5%,有一定的边际效益。对于前列腺转移癌、低容量转移患者、M1期且颅骨、肋骨、长骨和除淋巴结外的软组织无转移的患者,MAB可能有一定作用。