Neurologische Klinik der Universität Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
J Neurol. 2010 Oct;257(10):1718-26. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5610-8. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
Discriminating incipient Alzheimer's disease (AD) from major depression (MD) and age related memory decline is a challenge in clinical practice. Since AD is characterized by an early loss of neuronal and functional plasticity, a dynamic test strategy, such as the testing-the-limits (TtL) approach, that measures learning capacity can be a helpful diagnostic tool. To evaluate this, a short recognition paradigm consisting of a pre-test (baseline) and two post-test conditions with an interposed encoding instruction was developed and administered to individuals with incipient AD (n = 19; Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) 26.5), patients with depressive disorders (n = 11; MMSE 30), and healthy controls (n = 11; MMSE 30). In addition, participants completed a set of traditional neuropsychological tests that focused on the subjects' cognitive baseline performance. Intergroup comparisons (Kruskal-Wallis, U test) revealed significantly higher post-test failure rates in AD patients. Pre-test performance of MD and AD patients did not differ. Intra-group comparisons (Friedman, Wilcoxon test) showed that all three subject samples benefit from intervention in post-test 1. In contrast to MD and healthy individuals, who revealed significantly lower failure rates in post-test 2 compared to the pre-test, AD patients did not improve. Out of the 15 traditional test scores obtained, only two discriminated simultaneously between AD and each of the other groups. Our data confirm the finding of an impaired cognitive plasticity already present in very early stages of AD and illustrate the efficiency of a dynamic test approach in identifying incipient dementia.
区分早期阿尔茨海默病 (AD)、重度抑郁症 (MD) 和与年龄相关的记忆衰退是临床实践中的一项挑战。由于 AD 的特征是早期神经元和功能可塑性丧失,因此测试极限 (TtL) 等动态测试策略,这种策略可以衡量学习能力,可能是一种有用的诊断工具。为了评估这一点,开发了一种由预测试(基线)和两个具有中间编码指令的后测试条件组成的简短识别范式,并将其应用于早期 AD 患者(n = 19;简易精神状态检查 (MMSE) 26.5)、抑郁症患者(n = 11;MMSE 30)和健康对照组(n = 11;MMSE 30)。此外,参与者还完成了一组传统的神经心理学测试,重点关注受试者的认知基线表现。组间比较(Kruskal-Wallis,U 检验)显示 AD 患者后测失败率明显更高。MD 和 AD 患者的预测试表现没有差异。组内比较(Friedman,Wilcoxon 检验)表明,所有三组受试者在第一后测中均受益于干预。与 MD 和健康个体相比,后测 2 的失败率明显低于前测,而 AD 患者没有改善。在获得的 15 项传统测试分数中,只有两项同时区分了 AD 与其他两组。我们的数据证实了 AD 早期阶段已经存在认知可塑性受损的发现,并说明了动态测试方法在识别早期痴呆方面的效率。