Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Medical School, Osaka, Japan.
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Sep;64(3):707-14. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22469.
We examined the influence of flexed knee positions on cartilage MR assessments. Sagittal T(2), T*(2), and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) maps of the femoral cartilage were obtained in eight 6-month-old porcine femorotibial joints in the extended knee position (position A: flexion 0 degrees and femoral shaft in parallel with the amplitude of static field), flexed knee position (position B: flexion 40 degrees and femoral shaft oriented at 40 degrees to the amplitude of static field), and oblique-placed knee-extended position (position C: flexion 0 degrees and femoral shaft oriented at 40 degrees to the amplitude of static field). Comparison of the MR parameters between positions A and C showed isolated influence of the magic-angle effect, and comparison between positions A and B showed effects of knee flexion. Proteoglycan and hydroxyproline content in cartilage specimen at each region of interest had no significant correlation with T(2), T*(2), and dGEMRIC values. At the central zone, located on a weight-bearing area and parallel to the amplitude of static field, T(2)/T*(2)/dGEMRIC values increased by 6.8/11/0.8% at position C and by 24/44/31% at position B compared with position A. There was a significant increase in T(2) and T*(2) values at position B compared with those at position A. The substantial changes in T(2), T*(2), and dGEMRIC were shown in response to knee flexion, presumably due to the compounding influence of the magic-angle effect and change in the intra-articular biomechanical condition.
我们研究了膝关节弯曲位置对软骨 MRI 评估的影响。在 8 个 6 月龄猪膝关节中,分别在伸直位(位置 A:膝关节弯曲 0 度,股骨与静磁场平行)、屈膝位(位置 B:膝关节弯曲 40 度,股骨与静磁场成 40 度角)和斜置位膝关节伸直位(位置 C:膝关节弯曲 0 度,股骨与静磁场成 40 度角)获取矢状位 T2、T2 和软骨延迟钆增强 MRI(dGEMRIC)图谱。位置 A 与位置 C 的 MR 参数比较仅受“魔角效应”的影响,位置 A 与位置 B 的比较则同时受膝关节弯曲和“魔角效应”的影响。各感兴趣区软骨标本的糖胺聚糖和羟脯氨酸含量与 T2、T2 和 dGEMRIC 值均无显著相关性。在中央区,位于承重区且与静磁场平行,与位置 A 相比,位置 C 处 T2/T2/dGEMRIC 值增加了 6.8/11/0.8%,位置 B 处增加了 24/44/31%。与位置 A 相比,位置 B 处 T2 和 T2 值显著增加。T2、T*2 和 dGEMRIC 值的显著变化可能是由于“魔角效应”和关节内生物力学条件变化的综合影响。