• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个用于诊断未确诊糖尿病的简单中文风险评分。

A simple Chinese risk score for undiagnosed diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2010 Mar;27(3):274-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02943.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02943.x
PMID:20536489
Abstract

AIMS

A diabetes risk score for screening undiagnosed diabetes was constructed and validated in Chinese adults.

METHODS

Two consecutive population-based diabetes surveys among Chinese adults aged 20-74 years were conducted in 2002 (n = 1986) and 2006 (n = 4336). Demographic and anthropometric measures were collected following similar procedures. Standard 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) were performed to diagnose diabetes in both surveys. Fasting capillary plasma glucose (FCG) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) were also measured together with the OGTTs on the same day of the 2006 survey. Beta coefficients estimated using logistic regression analysis derived from data of the 2002 survey were used to develop the risk assessment algorithm. The performance of the algorithm was validated in the study population of the 2006 survey.

RESULTS

Of all the variables tested, waist circumference, age and family history of diabetes were significant predictors of diabetes and were used to construct the risk assessment score. The score, ranging from 3 to 32, performed well when applied to the study population of the 2006 survey. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 67.3% (95% CI, 64.9-69.7%) for the score, while it was 76.3% (73.5-79.0%) for FCG alone and 67.8% (64.9-70.8%) for HbA(1c) alone. At a cut-off point of 14, the sensitivity and specificity of the risk score were 84.2% (81.0-87.5%) and 39.8% (38.2-41.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk score based on age, waist circumference and family history of diabetes is efficient as a layperson-oriented diabetes screening tool for health promotion and for population-based screening programmes.

摘要

目的

构建并验证了一种适用于中国成年人的糖尿病风险评分,用于筛查未诊断的糖尿病。

方法

在 2002 年(n=1986)和 2006 年(n=4336),对年龄在 20-74 岁的中国成年人进行了两项连续的基于人群的糖尿病调查。采用相似的程序收集了人口统计学和人体测量学的测量数据。在这两项调查中,都采用标准的 2 小时 75 克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)来诊断糖尿病。在 2006 年的调查中,还同时测量了空腹毛细血管血浆葡萄糖(FCG)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))。使用来自 2002 年调查数据的逻辑回归分析估算的β系数,用于开发风险评估算法。该算法在 2006 年调查的研究人群中进行了验证。

结果

在所测试的所有变量中,腰围、年龄和糖尿病家族史是糖尿病的显著预测因素,用于构建风险评估评分。该评分范围为 3 至 32,在 2006 年调查的研究人群中表现良好。该评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 67.3%(95%CI,64.9-69.7%),而 FCG 单独的曲线下面积为 76.3%(73.5-79.0%),HbA(1c) 单独的曲线下面积为 67.8%(64.9-70.8%)。在 14 分的截断点处,风险评分的灵敏度和特异性分别为 84.2%(81.0-87.5%)和 39.8%(38.2-41.3%)。

结论

基于年龄、腰围和糖尿病家族史的风险评分,作为一种面向非专业人士的糖尿病筛查工具,在健康促进和基于人群的筛查计划中具有较高的效率。

相似文献

1
A simple Chinese risk score for undiagnosed diabetes.一个用于诊断未确诊糖尿病的简单中文风险评分。
Diabet Med. 2010 Mar;27(3):274-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02943.x.
2
Evaluation of two screening methods for undiagnosed diabetes in China: an cost-effectiveness study.中国两种未诊断糖尿病筛查方法的评估:一项成本效益研究。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2013 Dec;7(4):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
3
Performance of an A1C and fasting capillary blood glucose test for screening newly diagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes defined by an oral glucose tolerance test in Qingdao, China.在中国青岛,使用 A1C 和空腹毛细血管血糖检测筛查新诊断的糖尿病和口服葡萄糖耐量试验定义的糖尿病前期的性能。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):545-50. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1410. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
4
[Diagnostic value of fasting glucose, fructosamine, and glycated haemoglobin HbA(1c) with regard to ADA 1997 and who 1998 criteria for detecting diabetes and other glucose tolerance abnormalities].[空腹血糖、果糖胺及糖化血红蛋白HbA(1c)对美国糖尿病协会1997年及世界卫生组织1998年检测糖尿病及其他糖耐量异常标准的诊断价值]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2004;50(1):131-8.
5
Performance of HbA(1c) for detecting newly diagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes in Chinese communities living in Beijing.HbA(1c) 在检测居住在北京的华人群体中新诊断糖尿病和糖尿病前期中的表现。
Diabet Med. 2009 Dec;26(12):1262-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02831.x.
6
Validity of glycated hemoglobin in screening and diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese subjects.糖化血红蛋白用于筛查和诊断中国人群 2 型糖尿病的有效性。
Korean J Intern Med. 2012 Mar;27(1):41-6. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2012.27.1.41. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
7
Glycated haemoglobin A1c for diagnosing diabetes in Chinese population: cross sectional epidemiological survey.糖化血红蛋白 A1c 用于诊断中国人群糖尿病:横断面流行病学调查。
BMJ. 2010 May 17;340:c2249. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2249.
8
Relationship between glycated hemoglobin and glucose concentrations in the adult Galician population: selection of optimal glycated hemoglobin cut-off points as a diagnostic tool of diabetes mellitus.加利西亚成年人群糖化血红蛋白与血糖浓度之间的关系:选择最佳糖化血红蛋白切点作为糖尿病的诊断工具
Endocrinol Nutr. 2012 Oct;59(8):496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
9
A Chinese risk score model for identifying postprandial hyperglycemia without oral glucose tolerance test.一种无需口服葡萄糖耐量试验即可识别餐后高血糖的中国风险评分模型。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014 May;30(4):284-90. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2490.
10
Validation of an algorithm combining haemoglobin A(1c) and fasting plasma glucose for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in UK and Australian populations.一种结合糖化血红蛋白A(1c)和空腹血糖的算法在英国和澳大利亚人群中用于诊断糖尿病的验证。
Diabet Med. 2009 Feb;26(2):115-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02652.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A dual domain systematic review and meta-analysis of risk tool accuracy to predict cardiovascular morbidity in prehypertension and diabetic morbidity in prediabetes.一项双领域系统评价与荟萃分析:评估预测高血压前期心血管疾病发病率及糖尿病前期糖尿病发病率的风险工具的准确性
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 22;16:1527092. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1527092. eCollection 2025.
2
Validation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score and development of a country-specific diabetes prediction model for Turkey.芬兰糖尿病风险评分的验证及针对土耳其的特定国家糖尿病预测模型的开发。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 Feb 26;26:e18. doi: 10.1017/S1463423625000180.
3
Development, validation and visualization of a web-based nomogram for predicting risk of new-onset diabetes after percutaneous coronary intervention.
用于预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后新发糖尿病风险的基于网络的列线图的开发、验证及可视化
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 13;14(1):13652. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64430-9.
4
Performance of different machine learning algorithms in identifying undiagnosed diabetes based on nonlaboratory parameters and the influence of muscle strength: A cross-sectional study.基于非实验室参数和肌肉力量鉴别未诊断糖尿病的不同机器学习算法的性能:一项横断面研究。
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Jun;15(6):743-750. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14166. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
5
Machine learning for predicting diabetes risk in western China adults.用于预测中国西部成年人糖尿病风险的机器学习
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Jul 27;15(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01112-y.
6
Non-Laboratory-Based Risk Prediction Tools for Undiagnosed Pre-Diabetes: A Systematic Review.用于未诊断的糖尿病前期的非基于实验室的风险预测工具:一项系统综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 29;13(7):1294. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071294.
7
Measuring Self-management Among People with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Diabetes-Specific Instruments in English and Chinese.测量糖尿病患者的自我管理:英文和中文的患者报告糖尿病专用量表的系统评价。
Adv Ther. 2023 Mar;40(3):769-813. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02361-5. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
8
Classification of Type 2 Diabetes Incidence Risk and the Health Behavior of the 30-50-Year-Old Korean Adults: Latent Class Analysis.2 型糖尿病发病风险分类及 30-50 岁韩国成年人的健康行为:潜在类别分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 10;19(24):16600. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416600.
9
Development and validation of a risk assessment model for prediabetes in China national diabetes survey.中国国家糖尿病调查中糖尿病前期风险评估模型的开发与验证
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Nov 16;10(32):11789-11803. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i32.11789.
10
A Bayesian network model of new-onset diabetes in older Chinese: The Guangzhou biobank cohort study.基于广州生物银行队列研究的中国老年人群中新发糖尿病的贝叶斯网络模型。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 3;13:916851. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.916851. eCollection 2022.