• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于广州生物银行队列研究的中国老年人群中新发糖尿病的贝叶斯网络模型。

A Bayesian network model of new-onset diabetes in older Chinese: The Guangzhou biobank cohort study.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Molecular Epidemiology Research Centre, Guangzhou Twelfth People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 3;13:916851. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.916851. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fendo.2022.916851
PMID:35992128
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9382298/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Existing diabetes risk prediction models based on regression were limited in dealing with collinearity and complex interactions. Bayesian network (BN) model that considers interactions may provide additional information to predict risk and infer causation.

METHODS

BN model was constructed for new-onset diabetes using prospective data of 15,934 participants without diabetes at baseline [73% women; mean (standard deviation) age = 61.0 (6.9) years]. Participants were randomly assigned to a training (n = 12,748) set and a validation (n = 3,186) set. Model performances were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

During an average follow-up of 4.1 (interquartile range = 3.3-4.5) years, 1,302 (8.17%) participants developed diabetes. The constructed BN model showed the associations (direct, indirect, or no) among 24 risk factors, and only hypertension, impaired fasting glucose (IFG; fasting glucose of 5.6-6.9 mmol/L), and greater waist circumference (WC) were directly associated with new-onset diabetes. The risk prediction model showed that the post-test probability of developing diabetes in participants with hypertension, IFG, and greater WC was 27.5%, with AUC of 0.746 [95% confidence interval CI) = 0.732-0.760], sensitivity of 0.727 (95% CI = 0.703-0.752), and specificity of 0.660 (95% CI = 0.652-0.667). This prediction model appeared to perform better than a logistic regression model using the same three predictors (AUC = 0.734, 95% CI = 0.703-0.764, sensitivity = 0.604, and specificity = 0.745).

CONCLUSIONS

We have first reported a BN model in predicting new-onset diabetes with the smallest number of factors among existing models in the literature. BN yielded a more comprehensive figure showing graphically the inter-relations for multiple factors with diabetes than existing regression models.

摘要

背景

现有的基于回归的糖尿病风险预测模型在处理共线性和复杂交互方面存在局限性。考虑交互作用的贝叶斯网络(BN)模型可能会提供额外的信息来预测风险和推断因果关系。

方法

使用无糖尿病的 15934 名参与者的前瞻性数据[73%为女性;平均(标准差)年龄=61.0(6.9)岁]构建新发病例糖尿病的 BN 模型。参与者被随机分配到训练集(n=12748)和验证集(n=3186)。使用接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估模型性能。

结果

在平均 4.1(四分位距=3.3-4.5)年的随访中,1302 名(8.17%)参与者发生了糖尿病。所构建的 BN 模型显示了 24 个风险因素之间的关联(直接、间接或无),只有高血压、空腹血糖受损(空腹血糖 5.6-6.9mmol/L)和更大的腰围(WC)与新发糖尿病直接相关。风险预测模型显示,高血压、IFG 和更大 WC 的参与者发生糖尿病的后测概率为 27.5%,AUC 为 0.746[95%置信区间(CI)=0.732-0.760],敏感性为 0.727(95%CI=0.703-0.752),特异性为 0.660(95%CI=0.652-0.667)。与使用相同三个预测因子的逻辑回归模型相比(AUC=0.734,95%CI=0.703-0.764,敏感性=0.604,特异性=0.745),该预测模型似乎表现更好。

结论

我们首次报道了一种 BN 模型,用于预测新发病例糖尿病,该模型在文献中现有的模型中使用的因素数量最少。BN 产生了一个更全面的图形,直观地显示了多个因素与糖尿病之间的相互关系,优于现有的回归模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35fa/9382298/501eae50e0d9/fendo-13-916851-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35fa/9382298/025ed9225649/fendo-13-916851-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35fa/9382298/501eae50e0d9/fendo-13-916851-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35fa/9382298/025ed9225649/fendo-13-916851-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35fa/9382298/501eae50e0d9/fendo-13-916851-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Bayesian network model of new-onset diabetes in older Chinese: The Guangzhou biobank cohort study.基于广州生物银行队列研究的中国老年人群中新发糖尿病的贝叶斯网络模型。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 3;13:916851. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.916851. eCollection 2022.
2
Adiposity and incident diabetes within 4 years of follow-up: the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study.体脂与随访 4 年内新发糖尿病的关系:广州生物银行队列研究。
Diabet Med. 2017 Oct;34(10):1400-1406. doi: 10.1111/dme.13378. Epub 2017 Jun 4.
3
Prediction model for the onset risk of impaired fasting glucose: a 10-year longitudinal retrospective cohort health check-up study.空腹血糖受损发病风险预测模型:一项长达 10 年的纵向回顾性队列健康检查研究。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Oct 22;21(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00878-4.
4
A non-invasive risk score for predicting incident diabetes among rural Chinese people: A village-based cohort study.一种用于预测中国农村人群新发糖尿病的无创风险评分:一项基于村庄的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0186172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186172. eCollection 2017.
5
Validation of a nomogram for predicting regression from impaired fasting glucose to normoglycaemia to facilitate clinical decision making.用于预测从空腹血糖受损回归至正常血糖以辅助临床决策的列线图的验证
Fam Pract. 2016 Aug;33(4):401-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw031. Epub 2016 May 3.
6
Development and validation of risk prediction models for new-onset type 2 diabetes in adults with impaired fasting glucose.发展和验证空腹血糖受损成年人新发 2 型糖尿病风险预测模型。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Mar;197:110571. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110571. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
7
[Different anthropometric indices and incident risk of hypertension in elderly population: a prospective cohort study].[不同人体测量指标与老年人群高血压发病风险:一项前瞻性队列研究]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 6;53(3):272-278. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2019.03.007.
8
Impact of impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance on arterial stiffness in an older Chinese population: the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study-CVD.在老年中国人群中,空腹血糖受损和糖耐量受损对动脉僵硬度的影响:广州生物银行队列研究-CVD。
Metabolism. 2010 Mar;59(3):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
9
Identical anthropometric characteristics of impaired fasting glucose combined with impaired glucose tolerance and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: anthropometric indicators to predict hyperglycaemia in a community-based prospective cohort study in southwest China.空腹血糖受损合并糖调节受损及新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者的人体测量学特征:基于社区的前瞻性队列研究中预测中国西南地区人群高血糖的人体测量学指标。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 9;8(5):e019735. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019735.
10
Bayesian network ensemble as a multivariate strategy to predict radiation pneumonitis risk.贝叶斯网络集成作为预测放射性肺炎风险的多变量策略。
Med Phys. 2015 May;42(5):2421-30. doi: 10.1118/1.4915284.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of the Triglyceride-Glucose Index With Resistant Hypertension and a Nomogram Model Construction.甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与难治性高血压的相关性及列线图模型构建。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct;13(19):e034136. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034136. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
A Prediction Model for Identifying Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Uptake Among Children in Wuxi, China: Prospective Observational Study.中国无锡地区儿童季节性流感疫苗接种率预测模型:前瞻性观察研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jun 17;10:e56064. doi: 10.2196/56064.
3
Causal association study of the dynamic development of the metabolic syndrome based on longitudinal data.

本文引用的文献

1
Causal associations of waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio with type II diabetes mellitus: new evidence from Mendelian randomization.腰围和腰臀比与 2 型糖尿病的因果关系:来自孟德尔随机化的新证据。
Mol Genet Genomics. 2021 May;296(3):605-613. doi: 10.1007/s00438-020-01752-z. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations.应用健康研究中使用有向无环图(DAG)识别混杂因素:综述与建议。
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 May 17;50(2):620-632. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa213.
3
Evaluating the relationship between alcohol consumption, tobacco use, and cardiovascular disease: A multivariable Mendelian randomization study.
基于纵向数据的代谢综合征动态发展的因果关联研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 5;14(1):5448. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55693-3.
4
Integrate prediction of machine learning for single ACoA rupture risk: a multicenter retrospective analysis.整合机器学习对前交通动脉(ACoA)单发破裂风险的预测:一项多中心回顾性分析。
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 18;14:1126640. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1126640. eCollection 2023.
5
Causal discovery approach with reinforcement learning for risk factors of type II diabetes mellitus.基于强化学习的 II 型糖尿病风险因素因果发现方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Jul 21;24(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05405-x.
评估饮酒、吸烟与心血管疾病之间的关系:多变量孟德尔随机化研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Dec 4;17(12):e1003410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003410. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
An atlas on risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a wide-angled Mendelian randomisation study.2 型糖尿病风险因素图谱:广角孟德尔随机化研究。
Diabetologia. 2020 Nov;63(11):2359-2371. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05253-x. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
5
Waist circumference increases risk of coronary heart disease: Evidence from a Mendelian randomization study.腰围增加冠心病风险:来自孟德尔随机化研究的证据。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):e1186. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1186. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
6
A causal relationship between cigarette smoking and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A Mendelian randomization study.吸烟与 2 型糖尿病之间的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 18;9(1):19342. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56014-9.
7
Bayesian Networks for Risk Prediction Using Real-World Data: A Tool for Precision Medicine.贝叶斯网络在真实世界数据中的风险预测中的应用:精准医学的工具。
Value Health. 2019 Apr;22(4):439-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
8
Alcohol consumption and diabetes risk in a Chinese population: a Mendelian randomization analysis.饮酒与中国人群糖尿病风险:一项基于孟德尔随机化的分析。
Addiction. 2019 Mar;114(3):436-449. doi: 10.1111/add.14475. Epub 2018 Nov 25.
9
Hypertension in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Review of Blood Pressure Measurement Methods, Targets and Therapy.2 型糖尿病成人高血压:血压测量方法、目标和治疗的综述。
Can J Diabetes. 2018 Apr;42(2):188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
10
Risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus: An exposure-wide umbrella review of meta-analyses.2 型糖尿病的危险因素:荟萃分析的暴露范围伞式综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0194127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194127. eCollection 2018.