• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疼痛护理质量调查(PainCQ)的初始心理测量特性。

Initial Psychometric Properties of the Pain Care Quality Survey (PainCQ).

机构信息

University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

J Pain. 2010 Dec;11(12):1311-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.03.008. Epub 2010 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2010.03.008
PMID:20537957
Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study examined the psychometric properties of the Pain Care Quality (PainCQ) survey, a new instrument to measure the quality of nursing and interdisciplinary care related to pain management. Hospitalized medical/surgical oncology patients with pain from 3 states completed the 44-item version of the PainCQ survey following completion of a nursing shift. Interdisciplinary items were evaluated over the entire hospital stay; nursing care was evaluated during the previous shift. The sample included 109 patients ranging in age from 20 to 84 (mean = 53.09). The sample was 58.7% female, 88% non-Hispanic white. Principal Axis Factoring with an oblimin rotation was used as factors were correlated. Two scales resulted. The PainCQ-Interdisciplinary scale included 11 items representing 2 constructs and explaining 47.1% of shared item variance: partnership with the health care team (k = 6 items; α = .85) and comprehensive interdisciplinary pain care (k = 5 items; α = .76). The PainCQ-Nursing scale measured three constructs and explained 60.8 % of shared item variance: being treated right (k = 15 items; α = .95), comprehensive nursing pain care (k = 3 items; α = .77), and efficacy of pain management (k =4 items; α = .87). Results supported the internal consistency reliability and structural validity of the PainCQ survey with 33 items.

PERSPECTIVE

This article presents the psychometric properties of a new tool to measure interdisciplinary and nursing care quality related to pain management from the patient's perspective. This tool can be used for research and as a clinical performance measure to monitor and improve quality of care and patient outcomes.

摘要

本研究考察了新的疼痛护理质量(PainCQ)量表的心理测量学特性,该量表用于衡量与疼痛管理相关的护理和跨学科护理质量。有疼痛的住院内科/外科肿瘤科患者在完成一次护理班次后,完成了 44 项的 PainCQ 量表版本。跨学科项目在整个住院期间进行评估;护理评估在上一个班次进行。样本包括 109 名年龄在 20 岁至 84 岁之间的患者(平均年龄为 53.09 岁)。样本中 58.7%为女性,88%为非西班牙裔白人。采用主成分因子分析与斜交旋转,因为因子是相关的。产生了两个量表。PainCQ-跨学科量表包括 11 个项目,代表两个结构,解释了 47.1%的共同项目方差:与医疗保健团队的合作(k = 6 个项目;α =.85)和全面的跨学科疼痛护理(k = 5 个项目;α =.76)。PainCQ-护理量表测量了三个结构,解释了 60.8%的共同项目方差:得到正确的治疗(k = 15 个项目;α =.95)、全面的护理疼痛护理(k = 3 个项目;α =.77)和疼痛管理的疗效(k = 4 个项目;α =.87)。结果支持 PainCQ 量表的内部一致性信度和结构有效性,有 33 个项目。

观点

本文介绍了一种新工具的心理测量学特性,该工具用于从患者的角度衡量与疼痛管理相关的跨学科和护理质量。该工具可用于研究和作为临床绩效衡量标准,以监测和改善护理质量和患者结果。

相似文献

1
Initial Psychometric Properties of the Pain Care Quality Survey (PainCQ).疼痛护理质量调查(PainCQ)的初始心理测量特性。
J Pain. 2010 Dec;11(12):1311-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.03.008. Epub 2010 May 26.
2
Measuring the quality of care related to pain management: a multiple-method approach to instrument development.测量与疼痛管理相关的医疗服务质量:一种仪器开发的多方法途径。
Nurs Res. 2010 Mar-Apr;59(2):85-92. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181d1a732.
3
Development and testing of the Oncology Patients' Perceptions of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale.肿瘤患者对护理质量感知量表的开发与测试
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Mar-Apr;30(2):283-90. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.283-290.
4
Confirmatory factor analysis of the pain care quality surveys (PainCQ©).疼痛护理质量调查(PainCQ©)的验证性因子分析。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun;48(3):1018-38. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12014. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
5
The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations.患者对医疗保健期望的测量:对患者期望测量的综述和心理测量学测试。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Jul;16(30):i-xii, 1-509. doi: 10.3310/hta16300.
6
Validation of a modified version of the brief pain inventory for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.用于疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变的简明疼痛量表修改版的验证
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Apr;29(4):401-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.06.018.
7
Development of a psychometric scale to assess satisfaction with dental care among Sri Lankans.开发一种心理测量量表以评估斯里兰卡人对牙科护理的满意度。
Community Dent Health. 2009 Sep;26(3):150-6.
8
Trust in Nurses Scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation.信任护士量表:结构效度和内部信度评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Mar;66(3):683-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05168.x.
9
Evaluating the quality of pain management in a hospital setting: testing the psychometric properties of the Icelandic version of the revised American Pain Society patient outcome questionnaire.评估医院环境中疼痛管理的质量:测试冰岛语版修订后的美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷的心理测量特性。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Mar;15(1):143-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
10
Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.儿童复发性腹痛多维测量方法的开发:在三种环境下开展的基于人群的研究
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e210-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1412.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Quality of Pain Management Satisfaction Among Oncology Patients in a Hospital Setting: Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of Pain Care Quality Survey.评估医院环境中肿瘤患者疼痛管理满意度的质量:疼痛护理质量调查问卷阿拉伯语版的心理测量学特性。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Sep;9:e2300012. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00012.
2
Shared Decision-Making in Managing Breakthrough Cancer Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer.晚期癌症患者突破性癌痛管理中的共同决策
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2022 Jan;13(1):19-29. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2022.13.1.2. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Cross-Cultural Translation of the nChinese Version of Pain Care Quality Surveys (C-PainCQ).
中文版疼痛护理质量调查问卷(C-PainCQ)的跨文化翻译
Asian Pac Isl Nurs J. 2020;4(4):165-172. doi: 10.31372/20190404.1072.
4
Insight into Patients' Experiences of Cancer Care in Taiwan: An Instrument Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation Study.洞察台湾地区癌症患者的就医体验:一种工具翻译与跨文化调适研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 17;15(8):1772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081772.
5
Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment.衡量以患者为中心的医疗质量:为何患者报告的指标对可靠评估至关重要。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jun 24;9:831-5. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S81975. eCollection 2015.
6
Are we missing the Institute of Medicine's mark? A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures assessing quality of patient-centred cancer care.我们是否未达医学研究所的标准?一项关于评估以患者为中心的癌症护理质量的患者报告结局指标的系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Jan 25;14:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-41.
7
Confirmatory factor analysis of the pain care quality surveys (PainCQ©).疼痛护理质量调查(PainCQ©)的验证性因子分析。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun;48(3):1018-38. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12014. Epub 2012 Dec 3.