Suppr超能文献

疼痛护理质量调查(PainCQ)的初始心理测量特性。

Initial Psychometric Properties of the Pain Care Quality Survey (PainCQ).

机构信息

University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

J Pain. 2010 Dec;11(12):1311-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.03.008. Epub 2010 May 26.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study examined the psychometric properties of the Pain Care Quality (PainCQ) survey, a new instrument to measure the quality of nursing and interdisciplinary care related to pain management. Hospitalized medical/surgical oncology patients with pain from 3 states completed the 44-item version of the PainCQ survey following completion of a nursing shift. Interdisciplinary items were evaluated over the entire hospital stay; nursing care was evaluated during the previous shift. The sample included 109 patients ranging in age from 20 to 84 (mean = 53.09). The sample was 58.7% female, 88% non-Hispanic white. Principal Axis Factoring with an oblimin rotation was used as factors were correlated. Two scales resulted. The PainCQ-Interdisciplinary scale included 11 items representing 2 constructs and explaining 47.1% of shared item variance: partnership with the health care team (k = 6 items; α = .85) and comprehensive interdisciplinary pain care (k = 5 items; α = .76). The PainCQ-Nursing scale measured three constructs and explained 60.8 % of shared item variance: being treated right (k = 15 items; α = .95), comprehensive nursing pain care (k = 3 items; α = .77), and efficacy of pain management (k =4 items; α = .87). Results supported the internal consistency reliability and structural validity of the PainCQ survey with 33 items.

PERSPECTIVE

This article presents the psychometric properties of a new tool to measure interdisciplinary and nursing care quality related to pain management from the patient's perspective. This tool can be used for research and as a clinical performance measure to monitor and improve quality of care and patient outcomes.

摘要

本研究考察了新的疼痛护理质量(PainCQ)量表的心理测量学特性,该量表用于衡量与疼痛管理相关的护理和跨学科护理质量。有疼痛的住院内科/外科肿瘤科患者在完成一次护理班次后,完成了 44 项的 PainCQ 量表版本。跨学科项目在整个住院期间进行评估;护理评估在上一个班次进行。样本包括 109 名年龄在 20 岁至 84 岁之间的患者(平均年龄为 53.09 岁)。样本中 58.7%为女性,88%为非西班牙裔白人。采用主成分因子分析与斜交旋转,因为因子是相关的。产生了两个量表。PainCQ-跨学科量表包括 11 个项目,代表两个结构,解释了 47.1%的共同项目方差:与医疗保健团队的合作(k = 6 个项目;α =.85)和全面的跨学科疼痛护理(k = 5 个项目;α =.76)。PainCQ-护理量表测量了三个结构,解释了 60.8%的共同项目方差:得到正确的治疗(k = 15 个项目;α =.95)、全面的护理疼痛护理(k = 3 个项目;α =.77)和疼痛管理的疗效(k = 4 个项目;α =.87)。结果支持 PainCQ 量表的内部一致性信度和结构有效性,有 33 个项目。

观点

本文介绍了一种新工具的心理测量学特性,该工具用于从患者的角度衡量与疼痛管理相关的跨学科和护理质量。该工具可用于研究和作为临床绩效衡量标准,以监测和改善护理质量和患者结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验