Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jun 15;105(12):1825-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.370. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) may represent an independent risk factor for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs (LL-PAD), but prospective data are scant. We estimated the association between baseline Lp(a) with prevalent and incident LL-PAD in older subjects from the InCHIANTI Study. LL-PAD, defined as an ankle-brachial index <0.90, was assessed at baseline and over a 6-year follow-up in a sample of 1,002 Italian subjects 60 to 96 years of age. Plasma Lp(a) and potential traditional and novel cardiovascular risk factors (including a score based on relevant inflammatory markers) were entered in multivariable models to assess their association with prevalent and incident LL-PAD. At baseline, Lp(a) concentration was directly related to the number of increased inflammatory markers (p <0.05). There were 125 (12.5%) prevalent cases of LL-PAD and 57 (8.3%) incident cases. After adjustment for potential confounders, participants in the highest quartile of the Lp(a) distribution (>/=32.9 mg/dl) were more likely to have LL-PAD compared to those in the lowest quartile (odds ratio [OR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 3.33). The association was stronger (OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.50 to 9.61) if LL-PAD was defined by harder criteria, namely an ankle-brachial index <0.70. Compared to subjects in the lowest Lp(a) quartile, those in the highest quartile showed a somewhat increased risk of incident LL-PAD (lowest quartile 7.7%, highest quartile 10.8%), but the association was not statistically significant (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.71 to 3.22). In conclusion, Lp(a) is an independent LL-PAD correlate in the cross-sectional evaluation, but further prospective studies in larger populations, with longer follow-up and more definite LL-PAD ranking, might be needed to establish a longitudinal association.
脂蛋白(a)(Lp[a])可能是下肢外周动脉疾病(LL-PAD)的独立危险因素,但前瞻性数据很少。我们评估了基础 Lp(a)与老年人群中基线和 6 年随访期间的 LL-PAD 的关联。LL-PAD 定义为踝臂指数 <0.90,在 1002 名 60-96 岁的意大利受试者中进行了评估。将血浆 Lp(a)和潜在的传统和新型心血管危险因素(包括基于相关炎症标志物的评分)纳入多变量模型,以评估其与现患和新发 LL-PAD 的关系。在基线时,Lp(a)浓度与增加的炎症标志物数量直接相关(p <0.05)。共有 125 例(12.5%)现患 LL-PAD 和 57 例(8.3%)新发 LL-PAD。在调整潜在混杂因素后,Lp(a)分布最高四分位数(>/=32.9mg/dl)的参与者与 Lp(a)分布最低四分位数的参与者相比,更有可能患有 LL-PAD(比值比[OR]1.83,95%置信区间[CI]1.01-3.33)。如果将 LL-PAD 定义为更严格的标准,即踝臂指数<0.70,则关联更强(OR 3.80,95%CI 1.50-9.61)。与 Lp(a)最低四分位的受试者相比,Lp(a)最高四分位的受试者新发 LL-PAD 的风险略有增加(最低四分位 7.7%,最高四分位 10.8%),但关联无统计学意义(OR 1.52,95%CI 0.71-3.22)。总之,Lp(a)在横断面评估中是 LL-PAD 的独立相关因素,但需要在更大的人群中进行更长时间的前瞻性研究,并对 LL-PAD 进行更明确的分级,以确定纵向关联。