Suppr超能文献

规划姑息治疗培训研讨会:奥地利全科医生和护士偏好的横断面调查。

Planning training seminars in palliative care: a cross-sectional survey on the preferences of general practitioners and nurses in Austria.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2010 Jun 11;10:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-43.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Training in palliative care is frequently requested by health care professionals. However, little is known in detail about the subject matters and the educational preferences of physicians and staff or assistant nurses in this field.

METHODS

All 897 registered GPs and all 933 registered home care nurses in the district of Steiermark/Austria were sent postal questionnaires.

RESULTS

Results from 546 (30%) respondents revealed that GPs prefer evening courses and weekend seminars, whereas staff and assistant nurses prefer one-day courses. Multidisciplinary sessions are preferred by almost 80% of all professional groups. GPs preferred multi disciplinary groups most frequently when addressing psychosocial needs (88.8%) and ethical questions (85.8%). Staff and assistant nurses preferred multidisciplinary groups most frequently in the area of pain management (88%) and opted for multi disciplinary learning to a significantly higher extent than GPs (69%; p < 0.01). Those topics were ranked first which are not only deepening, but supplementing the professional training. On average, GPs were willing to spend a maximum amount of euro 400 per year for training seminars in palliative care, whereas nurses would spend approximately euro 190 for such classes.The results provide a detailed analysis of the preferences of GPs and nurses and offer guidance for the organisation of training seminars in palliative care.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical and nursing education programs often pursue separate paths. Yet our findings indicate that in palliative care multidisciplinary training seminars are favoured by both, doctors and nurses. Also, both groups prefer topics that are not only deepening, but supplementing their professional knowledge.

摘要

背景

姑息治疗培训经常受到医疗保健专业人员的要求。然而,对于该领域的医生、医务人员和助理护士的学科内容和教育偏好,我们知之甚少。

方法

向施蒂里亚州/奥地利地区的所有 897 名注册全科医生和所有 933 名注册家庭护理护士邮寄问卷。

结果

来自 546 名(30%)应答者的结果显示,全科医生更喜欢晚间课程和周末研讨会,而医务人员和助理护士更喜欢为期一天的课程。近 80%的专业群体都更喜欢多学科课程。全科医生在解决心理社会需求(88.8%)和伦理问题(85.8%)时最常选择多学科小组。医务人员和助理护士在疼痛管理领域(88%)最常选择多学科小组,并且比全科医生更倾向于多学科学习(69%;p<0.01)。这些主题不仅是深化,而且补充了专业培训,因此排名第一。全科医生愿意每年为姑息治疗培训研讨会最多花费 400 欧元,而护士则愿意为此类课程花费大约 190 欧元。这些结果提供了全科医生和护士偏好的详细分析,并为姑息治疗培训研讨会的组织提供了指导。

结论

医学和护理教育项目往往走不同的道路。然而,我们的发现表明,在姑息治疗中,多学科培训研讨会受到医生和护士的青睐。此外,两组都更喜欢不仅深化而且补充其专业知识的主题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd8a/2893516/4f634606354c/1472-6920-10-43-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验