Suppr超能文献

天花板效应使得休斯和尼科尔斯的数据分析和结论没有定论。

Ceiling effects make Hughes and Nicholson's data analyses and conclusions inconclusive.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Mount Royal University, 4825 Mount Royal Gate S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T3E 6K6.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2010 Dec;19(4):1135-7; discussion 1138-9. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Jun 11.

Abstract

Hughes and Nicholson (2010) suggest that recognizing oneself is easier from face vs. voice stimuli, that a combined presentation of face and voice actually inhibits self-recognition relative to presentation of face or voice alone, that the left hemisphere is superior in self-recognition to the right hemisphere, and that recognizing self requires more effort than recognizing others. A re-examination of their method, data, and analyses unfortunately shows important ceiling effects that cast doubts on these conclusions.

摘要

休斯和尼科尔斯(2010)认为,与声音刺激相比,人更容易从面部识别自己,与仅呈现面部或声音相比,同时呈现面部和声音实际上会抑制自我识别,左半球在自我识别方面优于右半球,并且自我识别比识别他人需要更多的努力。不幸的是,对他们的方法、数据和分析进行重新审查显示出重要的上限效应,这对这些结论提出了质疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验