Furedy J J
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1991 Jan-Mar;26(1):21-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02690974.
Either implicitly or explicity, most workers in the last two decades have adopted the (imperialistic) view that conditioning is simply the learning of (cognitive) S-S relationships, and that (noncognitive) S-R factors are irrelevant. I shall remind us of some contrary evidence from human Pavlovian autonomic conditioning (HPAC), consideration of which may spoil our neat cognitive picture (representation?) of the world, but may also lead both to a better understanding of the conditioning phenomenon and to more genuinely useful applications of conditioning principles to behavioral (including psychophysiological) problems.
在过去二十年中，无论是含蓄地还是明确地，大多数研究者都采纳了（帝国主义的）观点，即条件作用仅仅是对（认知性的）刺激-刺激关系的学习，而（非认知性的）刺激-反应因素则无关紧要。我将提醒大家一些来自人类巴甫洛夫自主神经条件作用（HPAC）的相反证据，对这些证据的思考可能会破坏我们对世界简洁的认知图景（表征？），但也可能会让我们更好地理解条件作用现象，并将条件作用原理更切实地应用于行为（包括心理生理）问题。
