Suppr超能文献

在一个大型耐药性癫痫患者连续队列中,抗癫痫药物不良反应、合并用药数量与药物负荷之间的关系。

Relationship between adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs, number of coprescribed drugs, and drug load in a large cohort of consecutive patients with drug-refractory epilepsy.

机构信息

Division of Neurology 2, Department of Medicine, Surgery, Dentistry, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2010 May;51(5):797-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02520.x. Epub 2010 Apr 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the adverse effects (AEs) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in adults with refractory epilepsy and their relationship with number of coprescribed AEDs and AED load.

METHODS

Patients with refractory epilepsy were enrolled consecutively at 11 tertiary referral centers. AEs were assessed through unstructured interview and the Adverse Event Profile (AEP) questionnaire. AED loads were calculated as the sum of prescribed daily dose (PDD)/defined daily dose (DDD) ratios for each coprescribed AED.

RESULTS

Of 809 patients enrolled, 709 had localization-related epilepsy and 627 were on polytherapy. AED loads increased with increasing number of AEDs in the treatment regimen, from 1.2 +/- 0.5 for patients on monotherapy to 2.5 +/- 1, 3.7 +/- 1.1, and 4.7 +/- 1.1 for those on two, three, and > or =4 AEDs, respectively. The number of spontaneously reported AEs correlated with the number of AEs identified by the AEP (r = 0.27, p < 0.0001). AEP scores did not differ between patients with monotherapy and patients with polytherapy (42.8 +/- 11.7 vs. 42.6 +/- 11.2), and there was no correlation between AEP scores and AED load (r = -0.05, p = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

AEs did not differ between monotherapy and polytherapy patients, and did not correlate with AED load, possibly as a result of physicians' intervention in individualizing treatment regimens. Taking into account the limitations of a cross-sectional survey, these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that AEs are determined more by individual susceptibility, type of AEDs used, and physicians' skills, than number of coprescribed AEDs and AED load.

摘要

目的

评估成人难治性癫痫患者抗癫痫药物(AED)的不良反应(AE)及其与合用 AED 数量和 AED 负荷的关系。

方法

在 11 个三级转诊中心连续招募难治性癫痫患者。通过非结构化访谈和不良事件概况问卷(AEP)评估 AE。AED 负荷通过计算每个合用 AED 的规定日剂量(PDD)/限定日剂量(DDD)比值的总和来计算。

结果

在纳入的 809 例患者中,709 例为局灶性相关癫痫,627 例为多药治疗。AED 负荷随治疗方案中 AED 数量的增加而增加,从单药治疗患者的 1.2+/-0.5 增加到 2.5+/-1、3.7+/-1.1 和 4.7+/-1.1,分别用于服用两种、三种和>或=4 种 AED 的患者。自发报告的 AE 数量与 AEP 确定的 AE 数量相关(r = 0.27,p <0.0001)。单药治疗和多药治疗患者的 AEP 评分无差异(42.8+/-11.7 vs. 42.6+/-11.2),AEP 评分与 AED 负荷之间无相关性(r = -0.05,p = 0.16)。

结论

单药治疗和多药治疗患者的 AE 无差异,且与 AED 负荷无关,这可能是由于医生在个体化治疗方案中进行了干预。考虑到横断面调查的局限性,这些发现与 AE 更多地由个体易感性、使用的 AED 类型和医生技能决定,而不是由合用 AED 数量和 AED 负荷决定的假设一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验