Central Veterinary Research Laboratory, Celbridge, Ireland.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2010 Aug 1;57(4):237-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2010.01141.x. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
This article reviews the options for use of virus detection techniques for decentralized testing of samples from suspected secondary outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). These options have been expanded by the advent of new tests including disposable lateral flow devices (LFDs) that detect viral proteins and portable RT-PCR equipment that detects viral RNA. LFDs have been developed with similar sensitivity to antigen detection ELISA but with the ability to provide a result 1-30 min after the addition of epithelium or vesicular fluid. Portable RT-PCR platforms are being developed that can detect FMD viral RNA in blood, epithelium or other materials with minimal sample processing and with high sensitivity, in as little as 60 min in some cases. These devices may be used on infected farms as pen-side tests, in regional, local or mobile laboratories, or in National Reference Laboratories (NRL). Advantages and disadvantages of different testing options are considered to inform decisions on the optimal strategies for different national circumstances. Issues include validation and quality control, containment needs, availability of test devices and reagents, the decision tree for declaring an outbreak, training issues and provision of samples for subsequent viral characterization. Tests to confirm the diagnosis of the index case of an outbreak of FMD should continue to be carried out in the NRL.
本文综述了病毒检测技术在疑似口蹄疫(FMD)继发暴发的样本分散检测中的应用选择。随着新检测方法的出现,这些选择得到了扩展,包括可一次性使用的侧向流动设备(LFD),可检测病毒蛋白,以及可检测病毒 RNA 的便携式 RT-PCR 设备。LFD 的开发具有与抗原检测 ELISA 类似的灵敏度,但具有在添加上皮或水疱液后 1-30 分钟内提供结果的能力。正在开发便携式 RT-PCR 平台,该平台可以在血液、上皮或其他材料中检测到 FMD 病毒 RNA,仅需最少的样品处理,并且在某些情况下具有很高的灵敏度,在 60 分钟内即可完成。这些设备可在感染农场用作栏边测试,在区域、地方或移动实验室,或在国家参考实验室(NRL)使用。考虑了不同检测选择的优缺点,以告知在不同国家情况下做出最佳策略的决策。问题包括验证和质量控制、遏制需求、测试设备和试剂的可用性、宣布暴发的决策树、培训问题以及为随后的病毒特征分析提供样本。在 NRL 中应继续进行确认暴发的索引病例的诊断测试。