Maree Francois F, Kasanga Christopher J, Scott Katherine A, Opperman Pamela A, Melanie Chitray, Sangula Abraham K, Raphael Sallu, Yona Sinkala, Wambura Philemon N, King Donald P, Paton David J, Rweyemamu Mark M
Transboundary Animal Diseases Programme, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Onderstepoort, Pretoria, South Africa.
Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Vet Med (Auckl). 2014 Oct 3;5:119-138. doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S62607. eCollection 2014.
The epidemiology of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in Africa is unique in the sense that six of the seven serotypes of FMD viruses (Southern African Territories [SAT] 1, SAT2, SAT3, A, O, and C), with the exception of Asia-1, have occurred in the last decade. Due to underreporting of FMD, the current strains circulating throughout sub-Saharan Africa are in many cases unknown. For SAT1, SAT2, and serotype A viruses, the genetic diversity is reflected in antigenic variation, and indications are that vaccine strains may be needed for each topotype. This has serious implications for control using vaccines and for choice of strains to include in regional antigen banks. The epidemiology is further complicated by the fact that SAT1, SAT2, and SAT3 viruses are maintained and spread by wildlife, persistently infecting African buffalo in particular. Although the precise mechanism of transmission of FMD from buffalo to cattle is not well understood, it is facilitated by direct contact between these two species. Once cattle are infected they may maintain SAT infections without the further involvement of buffalo. No single strategy for control of FMD in Africa is applicable. Decision on the most effective regional control strategy should focus on an ecosystem approach, identification of primary endemic areas, animal husbandry practices, climate, and animal movement. Within each ecosystem, human behavior could be integrated in disease control planning. Different regions in sub-Saharan Africa are at different developmental stages and are thus facing unique challenges and priorities in terms of veterinary disease control. Many science-based options targeting improved vaccinology, diagnostics, and other control measures have been described. This review therefore aims to emphasize, on one hand, the progress that has been achieved in the development of new technologies, including research towards improved tailored vaccines, appropriate vaccine strain selection, vaccine potency, and diagnostics, and how it relates to the conditions in Africa. On the other hand, we focus on the unique epidemiological, ecological, livestock farming and marketing, socioeconomic, and governance issues that constrain effective FMD control. Any such new technologies should have the availability of safe livestock products for trade as the ultimate goal.
非洲口蹄疫(FMD)的流行病学具有独特性,即口蹄疫病毒的七种血清型中的六种(南非地区[SAT]1、SAT2、SAT3、A、O和C),除亚洲1型外,在过去十年中均有出现。由于口蹄疫报告不足,目前在撒哈拉以南非洲地区传播的毒株在很多情况下都不为人知。对于SAT1、SAT2和A型病毒,遗传多样性反映在抗原变异上,有迹象表明可能需要针对每种拓扑型制备疫苗毒株。这对使用疫苗进行防控以及选择纳入区域抗原库的毒株具有严重影响。由于SAT1、SAT2和SAT3病毒由野生动物维持和传播,尤其持续感染非洲水牛,使得流行病学情况更加复杂。尽管口蹄疫从水牛传播到牛的确切机制尚未完全了解,但这两个物种之间的直接接触促进了传播。一旦牛被感染,它们可能在没有水牛进一步参与的情况下维持SAT感染。在非洲,没有单一的口蹄疫防控策略适用。关于最有效的区域防控策略的决策应侧重于生态系统方法、确定主要流行地区、畜牧业做法、气候和动物流动。在每个生态系统中,人类行为可纳入疾病防控规划。撒哈拉以南非洲的不同地区处于不同的发展阶段,因此在兽医疾病防控方面面临独特的挑战和优先事项。已经描述了许多基于科学的选项,旨在改进疫苗学、诊断方法和其他防控措施。因此,本综述旨在一方面强调在新技术开发方面取得的进展,包括改进定制疫苗的研究、合适疫苗毒株的选择、疫苗效力和诊断方法,以及这些进展与非洲情况的关系。另一方面,我们关注制约口蹄疫有效防控的独特流行病学、生态、畜牧养殖与销售、社会经济和治理问题。任何此类新技术都应以能够安全地进行畜产品贸易为最终目标。