Suppr超能文献

合格和不合格(N-R C)精神科护理人员——压力和倦怠的来源略有不同。一项欧洲多中心研究。

Qualified and Unqualified (N-R C) mental health nursing staff--minor differences in sources of stress and burnout. A European multi-centre study.

机构信息

Nordland Hospital Trust, 8092 Bodo, Norway/Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromso, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun 14;10:163. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-163.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unqualified/non-registered caregivers (N-R Cs) will continue to play important roles in the mental health services. This study compares levels of burnout and sources of stress among qualified and N-R Cs working in acute mental health care.

METHODS

A total of 196 nursing staff --124 qualified staff (mainly nurses) and 72 N-R Cs with a variety of different educational backgrounds--working in acute wards or community mental teams from 5 European countries filled out the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Mental Health Professional Scale (MHPSS) and the Psychosocial Work Environment and Stress Questionnaire (PWSQ).

RESULTS

(a) The univariate differences were generally small and restricted to a few variables. Only Social relations (N-R Cs being less satisfied) at Work demands (nurses reporting higher demands) were different at the .05 level. (b) The absolute scores both groups was highest on variables that measured feelings of not being able to influence a work situation characterised by great demands and insufficient resources. Routines and educational programs for dealing with stress should be available on a routine basis. (c) Multivariate analyses identified three extreme groups: (i) a small group dominated by unqualified staff with high depersonalization, (ii) a large group that was low on depersonalisation and high on work demands with a majority of qualified staff, and (iii) a small N-R C-dominated group (low depersonalization, low work demands) with high scores on professional self-doubt. In contrast to (ii) the small and N-R C-dominated groups in (i) and (iii) reflected mainly centre-dependent problems.

CONCLUSION

The differences in burnout and sources of stress between the two groups were generally small. With the exception of high work demands the main differences between the two groups appeared to be centre-dependent. High work demands characterized primarily qualified staff. The main implication of the study is that no special measures addressed towards N-R Cs in general with regard to stress and burnout seem necessary. The results also suggest that centre-specific problems may cause more stress among N-R Cs compared to the qualified staff (e.g. professional self-doubt).

摘要

背景

不合格/非注册护理人员(N-R C)将继续在精神卫生服务中发挥重要作用。本研究比较了在急性精神卫生保健工作中的合格护理人员和 N-R C 的倦怠水平和压力源。

方法

来自 5 个欧洲国家的急性病房或社区精神团队的 196 名护理人员 - 124 名合格护理人员(主要是护士)和 72 名具有各种不同教育背景的 N-R C - 填写了 Maslach 倦怠量表(MBI),心理健康专业人员量表(MHPSS)和心理社会工作环境和压力问卷(PWSQ)。

结果

(a)单变量差异通常较小,仅限于少数变量。仅工作关系(N-R C 满意度较低)和工作需求(护士报告的需求较高)在.05 水平上有所不同。(b)两组的绝对分数在衡量无法影响以高需求和资源不足为特征的工作情况的变量上得分最高。应该定期提供处理压力的常规和教育计划。(c)多元分析确定了三个极端群体:(i)一个由高去人性化的不合格人员主导的小群体,(ii)一个由高去人性化和高工作需求的大多数合格人员组成的大群体,以及(iii)一个由小 N-R C 主导的群体(低去人性化,低工作需求),专业自我怀疑得分较高。与(ii)相比,(i)和(iii)中的小和 N-R C 主导群体主要反映了以中心为中心的问题。

结论

两组之间的倦怠和压力源差异通常较小。除了高工作需求外,两组之间的主要差异似乎是中心依赖。高工作需求主要以合格人员为特征。该研究的主要意义是,不需要针对一般 N-R C 采取特殊措施来解决压力和倦怠问题。结果还表明,与合格员工相比,中心特定问题可能会给 N-R C 带来更大的压力(例如,专业自我怀疑)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ccc/2902466/24ec4b3b357b/1472-6963-10-163-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验