MAPP Centre for Research on Customer Relations in the Food Sector, Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus University, Haslegaardsvej 10, Aarhus V, Denmark.
Appetite. 2010 Oct;55(2):177-89. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.045. Epub 2010 May 28.
Based on in-store observations in three major UK retailers, in-store interviews (2019) and questionnaires filled out at home and returned (921), use of nutrition information on food labels and its understanding were investigated. Respondents' nutrition knowledge was also measured, using a comprehensive instrument covering knowledge of expert recommendations, nutrient content in different food products, and calorie content in different food products. Across six product categories, 27% of shoppers were found to have looked at nutrition information on the label, with guideline daily amount (GDA) labels and the nutrition grid/table as the main sources consulted. Respondents' understanding of major front-of-pack nutrition labels was measured using a variety of tasks dealing with conceptual understanding, substantial understanding and health inferences. Understanding was high, with up to 87.5% of respondents being able to identify the healthiest product in a set of three. Differences between level of understanding and level of usage are explained by different causal mechanisms. Regression analysis showed that usage is mainly related to interest in healthy eating, whereas understanding of nutrition information on food labels is mainly related to nutrition knowledge. Both are in turn affected by demographic variables, but in different ways.
基于在英国三大零售商的店内观察、店内访谈(2019 年)和在家填写并返回的问卷(921 份),调查了食品标签上营养信息的使用情况及其理解程度。还使用了一个涵盖专家建议知识、不同食品中营养成分含量以及不同食品中卡路里含量的综合工具,衡量了受访者的营养知识。在六个产品类别中,发现有 27%的购物者查看了标签上的营养信息,主要参考的是每日摄入量指南(GDA)标签和营养网格/表。使用各种涉及概念理解、实质性理解和健康推断的任务来衡量受访者对主要的预包装营养标签的理解程度。理解程度较高,高达 87.5%的受访者能够在一组三个产品中识别出最健康的产品。理解程度和使用程度之间的差异可以用不同的因果机制来解释。回归分析表明,使用主要与对健康饮食的兴趣有关,而对食品标签上营养信息的理解主要与营养知识有关。两者反过来又受到人口统计学变量的影响,但影响方式不同。