• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

六个欧洲国家对食品标签上营养信息的使用与理解。

Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries.

作者信息

Grunert Klaus G, Fernández-Celemín Laura, Wills Josephine M, Storcksdieck Genannt Bonsmann Stefan, Nureeva Liliya

出版信息

Z Gesundh Wiss. 2010 Jun;18(3):261-277. doi: 10.1007/s10389-009-0307-0. Epub 2010 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10389-009-0307-0
PMID:21124644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2967247/
Abstract

AIM

The goal of the study was to investigate the use of nutrition information on food labels and understanding of guideline daily amount (GDA) front-of-pack nutrition labels in six European countries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In-store observations and in-store interviews were conducted in major retailers in the UK (n = 2019), Sweden (n = 1858), France (n = 2337), Germany (n = 1963), Poland (n = 1800) and Hungary (n = 1804), supplemented by questionnaires filled out at home and returned (overall response rate 50.3%). Use of labels was measured by combining in-store observations and in-store interviews on concrete purchases in six product categories. Understanding of GDA front-of-pack nutrition labels was measured by a variety of tasks dealing with conceptual understanding, substantial understanding and health inferences. Demographics, nutrition knowledge and interest in healthy eating were measured as potential determinants. RESULTS: Across six product categories, 16.8% of shoppers were found to have looked for nutrition information on the label, with the nutrition grid (table or list), GDA labels and the ingredients list as the main sources consulted and calories, fat and sugar the information most often looked for. Understanding of GDA labels was high in the UK, Sweden and Germany, and more limited in the other countries. Regression analysis showed that, in addition to country-specific differences, use and understanding are also affected by differences in interest in healthy eating and in nutrition knowledge and by social grade. CONCLUSION: Understanding of nutrition information seems to be more widespread than use, suggesting that lack of use is a question of not only understanding, but also motivation. Considerable national differences exist in both understanding and use, some of which may be attributed to different histories of the role of nutrition in the public debate.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查六个欧洲国家食品标签上营养信息的使用情况以及对每日营养素参考摄入量(GDA)包装正面营养标签的理解。

对象与方法

在英国(n = 2019)、瑞典(n = 1858)、法国(n = 2337)、德国(n = 1963)、波兰(n = 1800)和匈牙利(n = 1804)的主要零售商处进行店内观察和店内访谈,并辅以在家填写并返还的问卷(总体回复率50.3%)。通过结合店内观察和店内访谈对六个产品类别的具体购买情况来衡量标签的使用情况。通过一系列涉及概念理解、实质理解和健康推断的任务来衡量对GDA包装正面营养标签的理解。测量人口统计学、营养知识以及对健康饮食的兴趣作为潜在决定因素。

结果

在六个产品类别中,发现16.8%的购物者会查看标签上的营养信息,其中营养表格(表格或列表)、GDA标签和成分列表是主要查阅来源,卡路里、脂肪和糖是最常查看的信息。英国、瑞典和德国对GDA标签的理解程度较高,而其他国家则较为有限。回归分析表明,除了国家间的差异外,使用和理解还受到对健康饮食的兴趣、营养知识以及社会阶层差异的影响。

结论

对营养信息的理解似乎比使用更为普遍,这表明不使用不仅是理解的问题,也是动机的问题。在理解和使用方面存在相当大的国家差异,其中一些可能归因于营养在公众辩论中作用的不同历史。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48e1/2967247/132d2438937b/10389_2009_307_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48e1/2967247/38c1978b9cd7/10389_2009_307_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48e1/2967247/486d115a93cc/10389_2009_307_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48e1/2967247/132d2438937b/10389_2009_307_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48e1/2967247/38c1978b9cd7/10389_2009_307_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48e1/2967247/486d115a93cc/10389_2009_307_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48e1/2967247/132d2438937b/10389_2009_307_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries.六个欧洲国家对食品标签上营养信息的使用与理解。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2010 Jun;18(3):261-277. doi: 10.1007/s10389-009-0307-0. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
2
Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK.英国消费者的营养知识,以及他们对食品标签上营养信息的使用和理解。
Appetite. 2010 Oct;55(2):177-89. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.045. Epub 2010 May 28.
3
Effects of interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels on food purchases: protocol for the Starlight randomised controlled trial.包装正面营养解读标签对食品购买的影响:星光随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 18;14:968. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-968.
4
Experimental study of front-of-package nutrition labels' efficacy on perceived healthfulness of sugar-sweetened beverages among youth in six countries.六国青少年中包装正面营养标签对含糖饮料健康感知影响的实验研究
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Sep 28;24:101577. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101577. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Packaged food consumption and understanding of front-of-pack labels in urban Thailand.包装食品消费与对泰国城市中预包装食品标签的理解。
Public Health. 2019 Jul;172:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 May 27.
6
Acceptability and understanding of front-of-pack nutritional labels: an experimental study in Mexican consumers.包装正面营养标签的可接受性和理解度:墨西哥消费者的一项实验研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):1751. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8108-z.
7
Warnings as a directive front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme: comparison with the Guideline Daily Amount and traffic-light systems.作为指令性前置营养标签方案的警告:与每日建议摄入量和红绿灯系统的比较。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2308-2317. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000866. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
Understanding of front of package nutrition labels: Guideline daily amount and warning labels in Mexicans with non-communicable diseases.理解包装正面营养标签:墨西哥非传染性疾病患者的日常指导量和警告标签。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0269892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269892. eCollection 2022.
9
An assessment of nutrition information on front of pack labels and healthiness of foods in the United Kingdom retail market.对英国零售市场包装正面标签上的营养信息及食品健康性的评估。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 8;21(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10255-4.
10
Sociodemographic differences in nutrition labels effect on Chilean and Mexican youth.营养标签对智利和墨西哥青少年影响的社会人口统计学差异。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2024 Apr 4;48:e33. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2024.33. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship Between Health Benefit Perception Moderate Wine Consumption, Wine Label and Healthy Behaviour.健康益处认知、适度饮酒、葡萄酒标签与健康行为之间的关系。
Foods. 2025 May 29;14(11):1937. doi: 10.3390/foods14111937.
2
The Organic Halo Effect: Perceived Caloric Disparities in High- and Low-Calorie Foods and the Role of Nutrition Label Reading Frequency.有机光环效应:高热量与低热量食品的热量认知差异及营养标签阅读频率的作用
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Apr;38(2):e70052. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70052.
3
Assessing the impact of a mandatory calorie labelling policy in out-of-home food outlets in England on consumer behaviour: a natural experimental study.

本文引用的文献

1
Penetration of nutrition information on food labels across the EU-27 plus Turkey.食品标签上的营养信息在欧盟 27 国加土耳其的渗透情况。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010 Dec;64(12):1379-85. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.179. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
2
Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market.针对澳大利亚食品杂货市场的包装正面食品标签系统的可接受性和有效性进行的消费者测试。
Health Promot Int. 2009 Jun;24(2):120-9. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap012. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
3
Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countries.
评估英国非家庭食品销售点强制卡路里标签政策对消费者行为的影响:一项自然实验研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):955. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22150-3.
4
Exploring Dietary Salt Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices among People of African Descent in the United Kingdom: A Qualitative Study.探索英国非洲裔人群的膳食盐知识、态度和行为:一项定性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 2;12(19):1969. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191969.
5
The Relation between Consumer Perception and Objective Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels (FOPNLs); Results from an Online Representative Survey.消费者对营养标签(FOPNL)的感知与客观理解之间的关系;来自在线代表性调查的结果。
Nutrients. 2024 Jun 3;16(11):1751. doi: 10.3390/nu16111751.
6
Consumers' Preferences towards Bread Characteristics Based on Food-Related Lifestyles: Insights from Slovenia.基于与食品相关生活方式的消费者对面包特性的偏好:来自斯洛文尼亚的见解
Foods. 2023 Oct 13;12(20):3766. doi: 10.3390/foods12203766.
7
A multi-country comparison of jurisdictions with and without mandatory nutrition labelling policies in restaurants: analysis of behaviours associated with menu labelling in the 2019 International Food Policy Study.多国比较有和没有强制性营养标签政策的司法管辖区:对 2019 年国际粮食政策研究中与菜单标签相关行为的分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Nov;26(11):2595-2606. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001775. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
8
Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling and Its Impact on Food Industry Practices: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.包装正面营养标签及其对食品行业实践的影响:证据的系统评价。
Nutrients. 2023 Jun 5;15(11):2630. doi: 10.3390/nu15112630.
9
Guideline Daily Amounts Versus Nutri-Score Labeling: Perceptions of Greek Consumers About Front-of-Pack Label.每日膳食营养素参考摄入量与营养评分标签:希腊消费者对包装正面标签的认知
Cureus. 2022 Dec 5;14(12):e32198. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32198. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Alignment of Nutri-Score with Mediterranean Diet Pyramid: A Food Level Analysis.Nutri-Score 与地中海饮食金字塔的一致性:食物层面分析。
Nutrients. 2022 Dec 1;14(23):5097. doi: 10.3390/nu14235097.
包装正面营养标签:在四个欧洲国家测试不同包装正面营养标签格式的有效性
Appetite. 2008 Jan;50(1):57-70. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.05.009. Epub 2007 Jun 3.
4
Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review.消费者对营养标签的理解与使用:一项系统综述
Public Health Nutr. 2005 Feb;8(1):21-8. doi: 10.1079/phn2005666.
5
Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods.消费者对食品健康和享乐特性的态度量化。
Appetite. 1999 Aug;33(1):71-88. doi: 10.1006/appe.1999.0232.
6
Development of a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire for adults.成人通用营养知识问卷的编制。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999 Apr;53(4):298-308. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600726.
7
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.社会心理学研究中的调节变量与中介变量区分:概念、策略及统计考量
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.