Mazess R B, Gifford C, Bisek J, Markwardt P
Lunar Radiation Corporation, Madison, WI 53713.
Calcif Tissue Int. 1991 May;48(5):308-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02556149.
We compared two approaches for determining soft tissue baseline with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the spine. An average baseline for the entire L2-L4 region resulted in overestimation of the L2 density by 2% and underestimation of L4 density by 2% in 122 subjects. The results for the L2-L4 region, and for L3, were comparable with both approaches and the precision error in vivo also was comparable (0.8%).
我们比较了两种通过脊柱双能X线吸收法(DEXA)确定软组织基线的方法。在122名受试者中,整个L2-L4区域的平均基线导致L2密度高估2%,L4密度低估2%。L2-L4区域以及L3的结果在两种方法中具有可比性,体内的精确误差也具有可比性(0.8%)。