Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 29;107(26):11999-2004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913004107. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
How persistent synaptic and spine modification is achieved is essential to our understanding of developmental refinement of neural circuitry and formation of memory. Within a short period after their induction, both types of modifications can either be stabilized or reversed, but how this reversibility is controlled is largely unknown. We have shown previously that AMPA receptors (AMPARs) are delivered to perisynaptic regions after the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) but are absent from perisynaptic regions after the full expression of LTP. Here, we report that perisynaptic AMPARs are GluR2-lacking and they translocate to synapses in a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent manner. Once entering synapses, these AMPARs quickly switch to GluR2-containing in an activity-dependent manner. Absence of postinduction activity or blocking interactions between GluR2 and NSF, or GluR2 and GRIP/PICK1 results in LTP mediated by GluR2-lacking AMPARs. However, these synaptic GluR2-lacking AMPARs are not sufficient to allow reversibility of LTP. On the other hand, postsynaptic inhibition of PKC activity holds AMPARs at perisynaptic regions. As long as perisynaptic AMPARs are present, both LTP and spine expansion remain labile: they can be reverted to the baseline state together with removal of perisynaptic AMPARs, or they can enter a stabilized state of persistent increase together with synaptic incorporation of perisynaptic AMPARs. Thus, perisynaptic GluR2-lacking AMPARs play a critical role in controlling the reversibility of both synaptic and spine modifications.
持续的突触和棘突修饰是如何实现的,对于我们理解神经回路的发育细化和记忆的形成至关重要。在诱导后很短的时间内,这两种类型的修饰都可以稳定或逆转,但这种逆转是如何控制的还很大程度上未知。我们之前已经表明,在长时程增强(LTP)诱导后,AMPA 受体(AMPARs)被递送到突触旁区域,但在 LTP 完全表达后,它们不存在于突触旁区域。在这里,我们报告说,突触旁 AMPARs 缺乏 GluR2,并且它们以蛋白激酶 C(PKC)依赖性的方式向突触转运。一旦进入突触,这些 AMPARs会快速以依赖于活性的方式切换到含有 GluR2 的形式。诱导后缺乏活性或阻断 GluR2 与 NSF 或 GluR2 与 GRIP/PICK1 之间的相互作用会导致 GluR2 缺失的 AMPAR 介导的 LTP。然而,这些突触旁 GluR2 缺失的 AMPARs不足以允许 LTP 的逆转。另一方面,PKC 活性的突触后抑制将 AMPARs 保留在突触旁区域。只要存在突触旁 AMPARs,LTP 和棘突扩张仍然不稳定:它们可以与去除突触旁 AMPARs 一起恢复到基线状态,或者它们可以与突触旁 AMPARs 的整合一起进入稳定的持续增加状态。因此,突触旁 GluR2 缺失的 AMPARs 在控制突触和棘突修饰的可逆性方面起着关键作用。