Department ofHealth Policy, George Washington University, 2121 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 15;152(12):804-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-12-201006150-00009.
The basic purpose of medical schools is to educate physicians to care for the national population. Fulfilling this goal requires an adequate number of primary care physicians, adequate distribution of physicians to underserved areas, and a sufficient number of minority physicians in the workforce.
To develop a metric called the social mission score to evaluate medical school output in these 3 dimensions.
Secondary analysis of data from the American Medical Association (AMA) Physician Masterfile and of data on race and ethnicity in medical schools from the Association of American Medical Colleges and the Association of American Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine.
U.S. medical schools.
60 043 physicians in active practice who graduated from medical school between 1999 and 2001.
The percentage of graduates who practice primary care, work in health professional shortage areas, and are underrepresented minorities, combined into a composite social mission score.
The contribution of medical schools to the social mission of medical education varied substantially. Three historically black colleges had the highest social mission rankings. Public and community-based medical schools had higher social mission scores than private and non-community-based schools. National Institutes of Health funding was inversely associated with social mission scores. Medical schools in the northeastern United States and in more urban areas were less likely to produce primary care physicians and physicians who practice in underserved areas.
The AMA Physician Masterfile has limitations, including specialty self-designation by physicians, inconsistencies in reporting work addresses, and delays in information updates. The public good provided by medical schools may include contributions not reflected in the social mission score. The study was not designed to evaluate quality of care provided by medical school graduates.
Medical schools vary substantially in their contribution to the social mission of medical education. School rankings based on the social mission score differ from those that use research funding and subjective assessments of school reputation. These findings suggest that initiatives at the medical school level could increase the proportion of physicians who practice primary care, work in underserved areas, and are underrepresented minorities.
医学院校的基本宗旨是培养能够照顾国民健康的医生。要实现这一目标,就需要有足够数量的初级保健医生,向服务欠缺地区分配医生,以及在劳动力中拥有足够数量的少数民族医生。
开发一种名为社会使命评分的指标,用于评估医学院校在这三个维度上的产出。
对美国医学协会(AMA)医师主文件中的数据以及美国医学院协会和美国骨科医学院中关于种族和民族的医学学校数据进行二次分析。
美国医学院校。
60043 名在实践中活跃的医生,他们于 1999 年至 2001 年期间从医学院毕业。
将实践初级保健、在卫生专业短缺地区工作和少数民族代表性不足的毕业生比例组合成一个综合的社会使命评分。
医学院校在医学教育的社会使命方面的贡献差异很大。三所历史上的黑人学院的社会使命排名最高。公立和社区为基础的医学院比私立和非社区为基础的医学院的社会使命得分更高。美国国立卫生研究院的资助与社会使命得分呈负相关。美国东北部和城市地区的医学院校培养的初级保健医生和在服务欠缺地区行医的医生较少。
AMA 医师主文件存在一些局限性,包括医生的专业自我指定、工作地址报告的不一致性以及信息更新的延迟。医学院所提供的公共利益可能包括社会使命评分未反映的贡献。该研究的设计并非旨在评估医学院毕业生提供的医疗质量。
医学院校在医学教育的社会使命方面的贡献差异很大。基于社会使命评分的学校排名与使用研究资金和主观评估学校声誉的排名不同。这些发现表明,医学院校可以采取一些措施,增加从事初级保健、在服务欠缺地区工作和少数民族代表性不足的医生的比例。