Suppr超能文献

边缘区淋巴瘤:影响最终结果的因素。

Marginal zone lymphomas: factors that affect the final outcome.

机构信息

Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2010 Sep 15;116(18):4291-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25325.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A retrospective review and analysis of 275 patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) was performed to determine prognostic factors. An effort was also made to establish a specific prognostic score for patients with extranodal MZL.

METHODS

Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the type of MZL: extranodal, nodal, and splenic. Factors analyzed included age; gender; presence of B symptoms; Zubrod performance score; clinical stage; serum β(2)-microglobulin, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, and hemoglobin levels; and presence of autoimmune disorder.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with extranodal, nodal, and splenic MZL were 87%, 89%, and 93%, respectively (P = .95). On multivariate analysis, splenic MZL patients had the best prognosis (hazard ratio, 0.18; P = .018). An elevated serum β(2)-microglobulin level (P = .010), B symptoms (P = .021), and male gender (P = .036) were found to be correlated with decreased recurrence-free survival (RFS) on multivariate analysis. Using these 3 variables, a 3-tier prognostic scoring system was created for patients with extranodal MZL: low-risk with no adverse factors, intermediate-risk with 1 adverse factor, and high-risk with ≥ 2 adverse factors. The 5-year RFS rates for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups were 80%, 71%, and 44%, respectively (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with extranodal and nodal MZL have a similar prognosis, whereas patients with splenic MZL have a better prognosis despite the increased prevalence of negative prognostic indicators. With the use of 3 readily available factors, a prognostic scoring system was identified for patients with extranodal MZL.

摘要

背景

对 275 例边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)患者进行回顾性分析和研究,以确定预后因素。并努力为结外 MZL 患者建立一个特定的预后评分系统。

方法

根据 MZL 类型将患者分为 3 组:结外、结内和脾。分析的因素包括年龄;性别;B 症状;Zubrod 表现评分;临床分期;血清β(2)-微球蛋白、乳酸脱氢酶、白蛋白和血红蛋白水平;以及自身免疫性疾病的存在。

结果

结外、结内和脾 MZL 患者的 5 年总生存率分别为 87%、89%和 93%(P =.95)。多因素分析显示,脾 MZL 患者预后最佳(风险比,0.18;P =.018)。血清β(2)-微球蛋白水平升高(P =.010)、B 症状(P =.021)和男性(P =.036)均与无复发生存率(RFS)降低相关,多因素分析显示。使用这 3 个变量,为结外 MZL 患者建立了一个 3 级预后评分系统:无不良因素的低危组、有 1 个不良因素的中危组和有≥2 个不良因素的高危组。低危、中危和高危组的 5 年 RFS 率分别为 80%、71%和 44%(P =.01)。

结论

结外和结内 MZL 患者的预后相似,而脾 MZL 患者尽管存在更多的负性预后指标,但预后较好。通过使用 3 个易于获得的因素,为结外 MZL 患者确定了一个预后评分系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验