Nierman D M
Medical Intensive Care Unit, Flushing Hospital Medical Center, NY 11355.
Crit Care Med. 1991 Jun;19(6):818-23. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199106000-00015.
To compare three devices that measure core body temperature at the bedside in ICU patients.
Prospective, consecutive sample.
Voluntary community teaching hospital.
Fifteen patients, 78 +/- 6 (SD) yrs of age, admitted to the medical ICU over a 5-month period who had pulmonary artery catheters inserted as part of their routine care were studied. Thirteen patients were studied once, one patient twice, and one patient six times for a total of 21 sets of measurements.
All patients had urinary bladder thermistor catheters inserted just before pulmonary artery catheterization. Simultaneous core temperatures were measured for the duration of pulmonary artery catheterization every 4 hrs by the pulmonary artery thermistor catheter, the bladder thermistor catheter, and by a tympanic membrane infrared probe set on its core temperature setting. The three devices were then compared with each other in vitro using a specialized constant water bath setup. Finally, two of the tympanic membrane infrared probes were compared with each other in 20 ambulatory emergency department patients.
Over 32 hrs of pulmonary artery catheterization, the pulmonary artery thermistor catheters and bladder thermistor catheters showed excellent agreement, with a bias of only -0.04 degrees C between the two. However, the bias comparing the tympanic membrane infrared probe with the pulmonary artery thermistor catheter was -0.38 degrees C, and the bias was -0.34 degrees C comparing the tympanic membrane infrared probe with the bladder thermistor catheter. The tympanic membrane infrared probe readings remained significantly higher than the pulmonary artery thermistor catheter or bladder thermistor catheter readings over the entire 32-hr period. The two tympanic membrane infrared probes compared with each other in emergency room patients showed excellent agreement (p less than .001). In the in vivo water bath setup, the tympanic membrane infrared probe on most of its settings again registered significantly (p less than .01) higher than both the pulmonary artery thermistor catheter and the bladder thermistor catheter.
Pulmonary artery thermistor catheters and bladder thermistor catheters appear to give consistent, highly reliable bedside measurements of core body temperature in ICU patients. The currently available device that measures core body temperature from the tympanic membrane appears to give erroneously high readings, and should be used with caution.
比较三种用于在重症监护病房(ICU)患者床边测量核心体温的设备。
前瞻性连续样本研究。
志愿社区教学医院。
研究了15名年龄为78±6(标准差)岁的患者,这些患者在5个月期间入住内科ICU,作为常规护理的一部分接受了肺动脉导管插入术。13名患者接受了一次研究,1名患者接受了两次研究,1名患者接受了六次研究,总共进行了21组测量。
所有患者在肺动脉导管插入术前均插入膀胱热敏电阻导管。在肺动脉导管插入术期间,每4小时通过肺动脉热敏电阻导管、膀胱热敏电阻导管以及设置为核心体温模式的鼓膜红外探头同时测量核心体温。然后使用专门的恒温水浴装置在体外对这三种设备进行相互比较。最后,在20名门诊急诊科患者中对两个鼓膜红外探头进行了相互比较。
在32小时的肺动脉导管插入术期间,肺动脉热敏电阻导管和膀胱热敏电阻导管显示出极佳的一致性,两者之间的偏差仅为-0.04℃。然而,鼓膜红外探头与肺动脉热敏电阻导管相比的偏差为-0.38℃,与膀胱热敏电阻导管相比的偏差为-0.34℃。在整个32小时期间,鼓膜红外探头的读数始终显著高于肺动脉热敏电阻导管或膀胱热敏电阻导管的读数。在急诊科患者中相互比较的两个鼓膜红外探头显示出极佳的一致性(p<0.001)。在体内水浴装置中,大多数设置下的鼓膜红外探头读数再次显著(p<0.01)高于肺动脉热敏电阻导管和膀胱热敏电阻导管。
肺动脉热敏电阻导管和膀胱热敏电阻导管似乎能为ICU患者提供一致、高度可靠的床边核心体温测量值。目前可用的通过鼓膜测量核心体温的设备似乎读数错误地偏高,应谨慎使用。