Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jul;105(1):69-75. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq133.
The success of incident reporting in improving safety, although obvious in aviation and other high-risk industries, is yet to be seen in health-care systems. An incident reporting system which would improve patient safety would allow front-end clinicians to have easy access for reporting an incident with an understanding that their report will be handled in a non-punitive manner, and that it will lead to enhanced learning regarding the causation of the incident and systemic changes which will prevent it from recurring. At present, significant problems remain with local and national incident reporting systems. These include fear of punitive action, poor safety culture in an organization, lack of understanding among clinicians about what should be reported, lack of awareness of how the reported incidents will be analysed, and how will the reports ultimately lead to changes which will improve patient safety. In particular, lack of systematic analysis of the reports and feedback directly to the clinicians are seen as major barriers to clinical engagement. In this review, robust systematic methodology of analysing incidents is discussed. This methodology is based on human factors model, and the learning paradigm which emphasizes significant shift from traditional judicial approach to understanding how 'latent errors' may play a role in a chain of events which can set up an 'active error' to occur. Feedback directly to the clinicians is extremely important for keeping them 'in the loop' for their continued engagement, and it should target different levels of analyses. In addition to high-level information on the types of incidents, the feedback should incorporate results of the analyses of active and latent factors. Finally, it should inform what actions, and at what level/stage, have been taken in response to the reported incidents. For this, local and national systems will be required to work in close cooperation, so that the lessons can be learnt and actions taken within an organization, and across organizations. In the UK, a recently introduced speciality-specific incident reporting system for anaesthesia aims to incorporate the elements of successful reporting system, as presented in this review, to achieve enhanced clinical engagement and improved patient safety.
事件报告在提高安全性方面的成功,尽管在航空和其他高风险行业中显而易见,但在医疗保健系统中尚未得到证实。一个能够提高患者安全性的事件报告系统将允许前端临床医生轻松报告事件,他们理解报告将以非惩罚性的方式处理,并且报告将有助于增强对事件因果关系和系统变化的学习,从而防止事件再次发生。目前,本地和国家事件报告系统仍存在重大问题。这些问题包括对惩罚性行动的恐惧、组织内安全文化不佳、临床医生对应该报告哪些内容缺乏理解、对报告的事件将如何进行分析以及报告最终将如何导致改善患者安全的变化缺乏认识。特别是,缺乏对报告的系统分析以及向临床医生直接反馈被视为临床参与的主要障碍。在这篇综述中,讨论了对事件进行稳健系统分析的方法。这种方法基于人为因素模型和学习范式,强调从传统的司法方法向理解“潜在错误”如何在一系列可能导致“主动错误”发生的事件中发挥作用的显著转变。向临床医生直接反馈对于保持他们的“参与”至关重要,并且应该针对不同级别的分析。除了关于事件类型的高级信息外,反馈还应包括对主动和潜在因素分析的结果。最后,它应该告知已采取哪些行动以及在什么级别/阶段采取了行动,以应对报告的事件。为此,需要本地和国家系统密切合作,以便在组织内和组织间吸取教训并采取行动。在英国,最近推出的针对麻醉的特定专业事件报告系统旨在纳入本综述中提出的成功报告系统的要素,以实现增强的临床参与和提高患者安全性。