• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient Safety Learning Systems: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis.患者安全学习系统:系统评价与定性综合分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 Mar 1;17(3):1-23. eCollection 2017.
2
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
3
Patient-Reported Incident Measure (PRIM) tools for reporting patient safety incidents: protocol for a scoping review.用于报告患者安全事件的患者报告事件测量(PRIM)工具:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 23;15(6):e096983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096983.
4
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Understanding and Overcoming Negative Attitudes That Hinder Adoption of Reablement in Dementia Care: An Explorative Qualitative Study.理解并克服阻碍痴呆症护理中采用康复护理的消极态度:一项探索性定性研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 12;18:3411-3422. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S522515. eCollection 2025.
7
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
9
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验中参与者和专业人员偏好影响的概念框架与系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9350.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Medication Errors among Inpatients in a Tertiary Government Hospital's Pulmonary Medicine Service: A Cross-sectional Retrospective Study.三级政府医院呼吸内科住院患者用药差错评估:一项横断面回顾性研究
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 Jul 15;59(9):40-61. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.10684. eCollection 2025.
2
How Were Patient Safety Incidents Responded to, Investigated, and Learned From Within the English National Health Service Before the Implementation of the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework? A Rapid Review.在《患者安全事件应对框架》实施之前,英国国家医疗服务体系是如何应对、调查和从中吸取教训的?一项快速综述。
J Patient Saf. 2025 Aug 1;21(5):e42-e55. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001349. Epub 2025 May 9.
3
Psychometrics evaluation of the Persian version of Attitudes toward Patient Safety Questionnaire (APSQ-III) in nursing students.护理专业学生中波斯语版患者安全态度问卷(APSQ-III)的心理测量学评估
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1419. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06318-w.
4
System-wide analysis of qualitative hospital incident data: Feasibility of semi-automated content analysis to uncover insights.医院定性事件数据的全系统分析:半自动内容分析以揭示见解的可行性。
Health Inf Manag. 2025 Sep;54(3):247-254. doi: 10.1177/18333583241299433. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
5
Patient Safety Incident Reporting and Learning Guidelines Implemented by Health Care Professionals in Specialized Care Units: Scoping Review.专业护理病房医护人员实施的患者安全事件报告和学习指南:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 4;26:e48580. doi: 10.2196/48580.
6
The paradox of workplace violence in the intensive care unit: a focus group study.重症监护病房工作场所暴力的悖论:一项焦点小组研究。
Crit Care. 2024 Jul 11;28(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05028-5.
7
Metrics Matter.指标很重要。
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Jan 26;58(1):5-6. doi: 10.47895/amp.v58i1.9583. eCollection 2024.
8
Learning from patient safety incidents: The Green Cross method.从患者安全事件中学习:绿色十字方法。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Mar;30(2):e13114. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13114. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
9
Barriers to implementing patient safety incident reporting and learning guidelines in specialised care units, KwaZulu-Natal: A qualitative study.在夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的专业护理病房实施患者安全事件报告和学习指南的障碍:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0289857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289857. eCollection 2024.
10
Analysis of Intervention Employability in Pharmacy-Related Medication Safety Reports at a Tertiary Medical Center.三级医疗中心药学相关用药安全报告中的干预可操作性分析
Hosp Pharm. 2024 Apr;59(2):210-216. doi: 10.1177/00185787231207995. Epub 2023 Nov 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes and perceived barriers influencing incident reporting by nurses and their correlation with reported incidents: A systematic review.影响护士事件报告的态度和感知障碍及其与报告事件的相关性:一项系统综述。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(1):1-65. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-44.
2
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审:2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
3
How Effective Are Incident-Reporting Systems for Improving Patient Safety? A Systematic Literature Review.事件报告系统对改善患者安全的效果如何?一项系统文献综述。
Milbank Q. 2015 Dec;93(4):826-66. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12166.
4
Incident learning in pursuit of high reliability: implementing a comprehensive, low-threshold reporting program in a large, multisite radiation oncology department.追求高可靠性的事件学习:在一个大型多机构放射肿瘤学部门实施全面、低门槛的报告程序。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Apr;41(4):160-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41021-9.
5
Factors that influence the recognition, reporting and resolution of incidents related to medical devices and other healthcare technologies: a systematic review.影响与医疗设备及其他医疗技术相关事件的识别、报告和解决的因素:一项系统综述
Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 29;4:37. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0028-0.
6
Physician attitudes and practices related to voluntary error and near-miss reporting.医生与自愿性差错及未遂事件报告相关的态度和行为。
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Sep;10(5):e350-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001353. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
7
National critical incident reporting systems relevant to anaesthesia: a European survey.与麻醉相关的国家重大事件报告系统:一项欧洲调查。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):546-55. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet406. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
8
Lessons learnt from the development of the Patient Safety Incidents Reporting an Learning System for the Spanish National Health System: SiNASP.从西班牙国家卫生系统患者安全事件报告与学习系统(SiNASP)的开发中汲取的经验教训。
Rev Calid Asist. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
9
Electronic error-reporting systems: a case study into the impact on nurse reporting of medical errors.电子错误报告系统:对医疗错误护士报告影响的案例研究。
Nurs Outlook. 2013 Nov-Dec;61(6):417-426.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
10
Reporting, learning and the culture of safety.报告、学习与安全文化。
Healthc Q. 2012;15 Spec No:12-7. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2012.22847.

患者安全学习系统:系统评价与定性综合分析

Patient Safety Learning Systems: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis.

出版信息

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 Mar 1;17(3):1-23. eCollection 2017.

PMID:28326148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5357133/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A patient safety learning system (sometimes called a critical incident reporting system) refers to structured reporting, collation, and analysis of critical incidents. To inform a provincial working group's recommendations for an Ontario Patient Safety Event Learning System, a systematic review was undertaken to determine design features that would optimize its adoption into the health care system and would inform implementation strategies.

METHODS

The objective of this review was to address two research questions: (a) what are the barriers to and facilitators of successful adoption of a patient safety learning system reported by health professionals and (b) what design components maximize successful adoption and implementation? To answer the first question, we used a published systematic review. To answer the second question, we used scoping study methodology.

RESULTS

Common barriers reported in the literature by health care professionals included fear of blame, legal penalties, the perception that incident reporting does not improve patient safety, lack of organizational support, inadequate feedback, lack of knowledge about incident reporting systems, and lack of understanding about what constitutes an error. Common facilitators included a non-accusatory environment, the perception that incident reporting improves safety, clarification of the route of reporting and of how the system uses reports, enhanced feedback, role models (such as managers) using and promoting reporting, legislated protection of those who report, ability to report anonymously, education and training opportunities, and clear guidelines on what to report. Components of a patient safety learning system that increased successful adoption and implementation were emphasis on a blame-free culture that encourages reporting and learning, clear guidelines on how and what to report, making sure the system is user-friendly, organizational development support for data analysis to generate meaningful learning outcomes, and multiple mechanisms to provide feedback through routes to reporters and the wider community (local meetings, email alerts, bulletins, paper contributions, etc.).

CONCLUSIONS

The design of a patient safety learning system can be optimized by an awareness of the barriers to and facilitators of successful adoption and implementation identified by health care professionals. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a patient safety learning system is needed to refine its design.

摘要

背景

患者安全学习系统(有时称为重大事件报告系统)是指对重大事件进行结构化报告、整理和分析。为了为省级工作组关于安大略省患者安全事件学习系统的建议提供依据,开展了一项系统评价,以确定能够优化其在医疗系统中采用并为实施策略提供依据的设计特征。

方法

本评价的目的是解决两个研究问题:(a)卫生专业人员报告的成功采用患者安全学习系统的障碍和促进因素有哪些?(b)哪些设计要素能最大限度地提高成功采用和实施的几率?为回答第一个问题,我们使用了已发表的系统评价。为回答第二个问题,我们采用了范围界定研究方法。

结果

卫生保健专业人员在文献中报告的常见障碍包括害怕受到指责、法律处罚、认为事件报告无助于提高患者安全、缺乏组织支持、反馈不足、对事件报告系统缺乏了解以及对什么构成错误缺乏认识。常见的促进因素包括无指责环境、认为事件报告可提高安全性、明确报告途径以及系统如何使用报告、加强反馈、榜样(如管理人员)使用和推广报告、对报告者的立法保护、匿名报告的能力、教育和培训机会以及关于报告内容的明确指南。患者安全学习系统中能提高成功采用和实施几率的要素包括强调鼓励报告和学习的无指责文化、关于如何报告及报告内容的明确指南、确保系统便于使用、组织发展对数据分析的支持以产生有意义的学习成果,以及通过向报告者和更广泛社区反馈的多种机制(当地会议、电子邮件提醒、公告、书面投稿等)。

结论

通过了解卫生保健专业人员确定的成功采用和实施的障碍及促进因素,可优化患者安全学习系统的设计。需要对患者安全学习系统的有效性进行评估,以完善其设计。