Samanta S, Dey P, Nijhawan R
Department of Pathology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Cytopathology. 2011 Apr;22(2):111-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00773.x. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
Micronucleus (MN) scoring was carried out in benign (fibroadenoma) and malignant (infiltrating ductal carcinoma) breast lesions to evaluate the role of MN as a biomarker in breast carcinomas. We also compared MN scores among different cytological grades of breast carcinoma.
A total of 31 archival cases of fibroadenoma (FA) and 40 cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) were selected. The best May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) stained fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) smear of each case was selected. The MN scoring was carried out independently by two observers on 1000 epithelial cells in oil immersion magnification (100× objective). The MN scores in FA and IDC were compared. The IDC cases were graded and the MN scores in different cytological grades of IDC were compared.
The mean MN scores (± standard deviation) in FA and IDC were 0.6 (± 1.1) and 13.6 (± 12.8), respectively, which were significantly different (P < 0.0001). There were seven grade 1, 13 grade 2, and 20 grade 3 IDCs. The mean MN scores (± standard deviation) of grade 1, 2 and 3 IDC were 4.3 (± 2.3), 11.95 (± 9.2) and 21.1 (± 16.7), respectively. An analysis of variance (anova) test showed a significant difference in MN score between all the grades of IDC (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between fibroadenoma and grade 1 IDC. The Pearson's correlation coefficient showed positive correlations between MN scoring in the different grades of IDC.
MN scoring on routinely stained smears of IDCs was significantly higher than in fibroadenoma and was relatively easy, reliable and reproducible. As MN scoring of grade 1 IDC was similar to fibroadenoma, a larger study should be conducted to compare grade 1 IDC with other benign breast lesions.
对良性(纤维腺瘤)和恶性(浸润性导管癌)乳腺病变进行微核(MN)评分,以评估MN作为乳腺癌生物标志物的作用。我们还比较了不同细胞学分级的乳腺癌之间的MN评分。
共选取31例存档的纤维腺瘤(FA)病例和40例浸润性导管癌(IDC)病例。选取每例病例最佳的May-Grünwald-Giemsa(MGG)染色细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)涂片。由两名观察者在油镜放大倍数(100×物镜)下对1000个上皮细胞独立进行MN评分。比较FA和IDC中的MN评分。对IDC病例进行分级,并比较不同细胞学分级的IDC中的MN评分。
FA和IDC中的平均MN评分(±标准差)分别为0.6(±1.1)和13.6(±12.8),差异有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。有7例1级、13例2级和20例3级IDC。1级、2级和3级IDC的平均MN评分(±标准差)分别为4.3(±2.3)、11.95(±9.2)和21.1(±16.7)。方差分析(anova)测试显示所有分级的IDC之间MN评分存在显著差异(P<0.05)。然而,纤维腺瘤与1级IDC之间无显著差异。Pearson相关系数显示不同分级的IDC中MN评分之间呈正相关。
对IDC常规染色涂片进行MN评分显著高于纤维腺瘤,且相对简便、可靠、可重复。由于1级IDC的MN评分与纤维腺瘤相似,应开展更大规模的研究以比较1级IDC与其他良性乳腺病变。