Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Sep;61(2):87-105. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.03.001.
Recent efforts to understand the mechanisms underlying human cooperation have focused on the notion of trust, with research illustrating that both initial impressions and previous interactions impact the amount of trust people place in a partner. Less is known, however, about how these two types of information interact in iterated exchanges. The present study examined how implicit initial trustworthiness information interacts with experienced trustworthiness in a repeated Trust Game. Consistent with our hypotheses, these two factors reliably influence behavior both independently and synergistically, in terms of how much money players were willing to entrust to their partner and also in their post-game subjective ratings of trustworthiness. To further understand this interaction, we used Reinforcement Learning models to test several distinct processing hypotheses. These results suggest that trustworthiness is a belief about probability of reciprocation based initially on implicit judgments, and then dynamically updated based on experiences. This study provides a novel quantitative framework to conceptualize the notion of trustworthiness.
最近,人们致力于理解人类合作的机制,重点关注信任的概念,研究表明,初始印象和以往的互动都会影响人们对合作伙伴的信任程度。然而,人们对这两种类型的信息在迭代交换中是如何相互作用的了解甚少。本研究在重复的信任博弈中检验了内隐初始可信度信息与经验可信度如何相互作用。与我们的假设一致,这两个因素在参与者愿意向其合作伙伴委托多少钱以及他们在游戏后的主观信任度评分方面,可靠地独立且协同地影响行为。为了进一步理解这种相互作用,我们使用强化学习模型来测试几种不同的处理假设。这些结果表明,信任度最初是基于内隐判断对互惠概率的一种信念,然后根据经验进行动态更新。这项研究提供了一个新颖的定量框架来概念化可信度的概念。