Suppr超能文献

小组互动式教育与基于讲座的单纯信息类项目对改变动机和生活方式行为的效果比较。康复住院患者的前瞻性对照试验。

Effectiveness of small-group interactive education vs. lecture-based information-only programs on motivation to change and lifestyle behaviours. A prospective controlled trial of rehabilitation inpatients.

机构信息

University of Würzburg, Institute of Psychotherapy and Medical Psychology, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Feb;82(2):186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.031.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although patient education may promote motivation to change health behaviours, the most effective method has not yet been determined.

METHODS

This prospective, controlled trial compared an interactive, patient-oriented group program with lectures providing only information. We evaluated motivational stages of change and self-reported behaviours in three domains (sports, diet, relaxation) at four times up to one year (60% complete data) among 753 German rehabilitation inpatients (mean age 50 years, 52% male) with orthopaedic (59%) or cardiologic disorders (10%) or diabetes mellitus (31%).

RESULTS

We found improvements between baseline and follow up regarding each outcome (p<.001) in both groups. At the end of rehabilitation, participants of the interactive group, as compared to the lectures, showed more advanced motivation regarding diet (p<.10) and sports (p=.006). Interactive group patients reported healthier diets both after 3 months (p=0.013) and 12 months (p=0.047), more relaxation behaviours (p=.029) after 3 months and higher motivation for sports after 12 months (p=.08).

CONCLUSIONS

The superior effectiveness of the interactive group was only partly confirmed.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This short, 5-session interactive program may not be superior to lectures to induce major sustainable changes in motivation.

摘要

目的

尽管患者教育可能会促进改变健康行为的动机,但尚未确定最有效的方法。

方法

本前瞻性、对照试验比较了互动式、以患者为导向的小组方案与仅提供信息的讲座。我们在一年的四个时间点(60%完成数据)评估了 753 名德国康复住院患者(平均年龄 50 岁,52%为男性)在三个领域(运动、饮食、放松)的动机变化阶段和自我报告的行为,这些患者患有骨科(59%)或心脏病(10%)或糖尿病(31%)。

结果

我们发现两组在每个结局(p<.001)方面都有从基线到随访的改善。在康复结束时,与讲座组相比,互动组的参与者在饮食(p<.10)和运动(p=.006)方面的动机更为先进。互动组患者在 3 个月(p=0.013)和 12 个月(p=0.047)后报告的饮食更健康,3 个月后报告的放松行为更多(p=.029),12 个月后报告的运动动机更高(p=.08)。

结论

互动组效果更好的结论仅得到部分证实。

实践意义

这个简短的 5 节互动式方案可能不如讲座那样能有效促进主要的可持续动机变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验