White Benjamin A, Brown David F M, Sinclair Julia, Chang Yuchiao, Carignan Sarah, McIntyre Joyce, Biddinger Paul D
Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
J Emerg Med. 2012 Mar;42(3):322-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.04.022. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
Emergency Department (ED) crowding is well recognized, and multiple studies have demonstrated its negative effect on patient care.
This study aimed to assess the effect of an intervention, Supplemented Triage and Rapid Treatment (START), on standard ED performance measures. The START program complemented standard ED triage with a team of clinicians who initiated the diagnostic work-up and selectively accelerated disposition in a subset of patients.
This retrospective before-after study compared performance measures over two 3-month periods (September-November 2007 and 2008) in an urban, academic tertiary care ED. Data from an electronic patient tracking system were queried over 12,936 patients pre-intervention, and 14,220 patients post-intervention. Primary outcomes included: 1) overall length of stay (LOS), 2) LOS for discharged and admitted patients, and 3) the percentage of patients who left without complete assessment (LWCA).
In the post-intervention period, patient volume increased 9% and boarder hours decreased by 1.3%. Median overall ED LOS decreased by 29 min (8%, 361 min pre-intervention, 332 min post-intervention; p < 0.001). Median LOS for discharged patients decreased by 23 min (7%, 318 min pre-intervention, 295 min post-intervention; p < 0.001), and by 31 min (7%, 431 min pre-intervention, 400 min post-intervention) for admitted patients. LWCA was decreased by 1.7% (4.1% pre-intervention, 2.4% post-intervention; p < 0.001).
In this study, a comprehensive screening and clinical care program was associated with a significant decrease in overall ED LOS, LOS for discharged and admitted patients, and rate of LWCA, despite an increase in ED patient volume.
急诊科拥挤现象已广为人知,多项研究表明其对患者护理有负面影响。
本研究旨在评估补充分诊与快速治疗(START)干预措施对急诊科标准绩效指标的影响。START项目通过一组临床医生对急诊科标准分诊进行补充,这些临床医生启动诊断检查并选择性地加快部分患者的处置流程。
这项回顾性前后对照研究比较了城市学术三级医疗急诊科在两个3个月期间(2007年9月至11月和2008年)的绩效指标。通过电子患者追踪系统查询了干预前12936例患者和干预后14220例患者的数据。主要结局包括:1)总体住院时间(LOS),2)出院患者和入院患者的LOS,以及3)未完成评估即离开的患者百分比(LWCA)。
在干预后期间,患者数量增加了9%,住院时间减少了1.3%。急诊科总体LOS中位数减少了29分钟(8%,干预前361分钟,干预后332分钟;p<0.001)。出院患者LOS中位数减少了23分钟(7%,干预前318分钟,干预后295分钟;p<0.001),入院患者减少了31分钟(7%,干预前431分钟,干预后400分钟)。LWCA降低了1.7%(干预前4.1%,干预后2.4%;p<0.001)。
在本研究中,尽管急诊科患者数量增加,但一项综合筛查和临床护理项目与急诊科总体LOS、出院患者和入院患者的LOS以及LWCA发生率的显著降低相关。