Traub Stephen J, Wood Joseph P, Kelley James, Nestler David M, Chang Yu-Hui, Saghafian Soroush, Lipinski Christopher A
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz; Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn.
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn; Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
J Emerg Med. 2015 May;48(5):620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.025. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
Although the use of a physician and nurse team at triage has been shown to improve emergency department (ED) throughput, the mechanism(s) by which these improvements occur is less clear.
For Objective 1, we compared LOS and LWBS on dates when we utilized RMA to comparable dates when we did not. For Objective 2, we utilized patient logs to divide patients into groups and estimated the effects of the RMA on each.
Objective 1. LOS fell from 297.8 min pre-RMA to 261.7 min during RMA, an improvement of 36.1 (95% confidence interval 21.8-50.4) min; LWBS did not change significantly. Objective 2. Patients seen and dispositioned by the RMA had an estimated decrease in LOS of 117.8 min (estimated decrease in LOS of 45%), but patients seen by the RMA whose care was transitioned to the main ED had an estimated increase in LOS of 25.0 min (estimated increase in LOS of 8%).
On a system level, the addition of an RMA shift at a single facility was associated with an improvement in LOS, but not LWBS. On a mechanistic level, it seems that improvements occurred as a result of the rapid disposition component of the RMA rather than placing advanced orders at triage.
尽管在分诊时使用医生和护士团队已被证明可提高急诊科(ED)的工作效率,但这些改善发生的机制尚不清楚。
1)描述快速医疗评估(RMA)团队对急诊科住院时间(LOS)和未就诊离开(LWBS)率的影响;2)评估RMA对不同患者群体的影响。
对于目标1,我们比较了使用RMA当天与未使用RMA的可比日期的住院时间和LWBS。对于目标2,我们利用患者日志将患者分组,并评估RMA对每组患者的影响。
目标1。住院时间从RMA前的297.8分钟降至RMA期间的261.7分钟,改善了36.1(95%置信区间21.8 - 50.4)分钟;LWBS没有显著变化。目标2。由RMA诊治并安排出院的患者估计住院时间减少了117.8分钟(估计住院时间减少45%),但由RMA诊治且护理工作转至主要急诊科的患者估计住院时间增加了25.0分钟(估计住院时间增加8%)。
在系统层面,在单一机构增加RMA轮班与住院时间的改善相关,但与LWBS无关。在机制层面,改善似乎是由于RMA的快速处置部分,而非在分诊时下达高级医嘱。