National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, National Mycobacteria Reference Laboratory, Bilthoven, Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Aug;48(8):2749-53. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00652-10. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
The mycobacterium growth indicator tube (MGIT960) automated liquid medium testing method is becoming the international gold standard for second-line drug susceptibility testing of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. We performed a comparative study of the current gold standard in the Netherlands, the Middlebrook 7H10 agar dilution method, the MGIT960 system, and the GenoType MTBDRsl genotypic method for rapid screening of aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistance. We selected 28 clinical multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant M. tuberculosis complex strains and M. tuberculosis H37Rv. We included amikacin, capreomycin, moxifloxacin, prothionamide, clofazimine, linezolid, and rifabutin in the phenotypic test panels. For prothionamide and moxifloxacin, the various proposed breakpoint concentrations were tested by using the MGIT960 method. The MGIT960 method yielded results 10 days faster than the agar dilution method. For amikacin, capreomycin, linezolid, and rifabutin, results obtained by all methods were fully concordant. Applying a breakpoint of 0.5 microg/ml for moxifloxacin led to results concordant with those of both the agar dilution method and the genotypic method. For prothionamide, concordance was noted only at the lowest and highest MICs. The phenotypic methods yielded largely identical results, except for those for prothionamide. Our study supports the following breakpoints for the MGIT960 method: 1 microg/ml for amikacin, linezolid, and clofazimine, 0.5 microg/ml for moxifloxacin and rifabutin, and 2.5 microg/ml for capreomycin. No breakpoint was previously proposed for clofazimine. For prothionamide, a division into susceptible, intermediate, and resistant seems warranted, although the boundaries require additional study. The genotypic assay proved a reliable and rapid method for predicting aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistance.
分枝杆菌生长指示管(MGIT960)自动化液体培养基检测方法正在成为多药和广泛耐药结核分枝杆菌复合群分离株二线药物敏感性检测的国际金标准。我们对荷兰目前的金标准、Middlebrook 7H10 琼脂稀释法、MGIT960 系统和 GenoType MTBDRsl 基因分型方法进行了比较研究,用于快速筛查氨基糖苷类和氟喹诺酮类耐药性。我们选择了 28 株临床多药和广泛耐药结核分枝杆菌复合群菌株和结核分枝杆菌 H37Rv。我们在表型测试中包含阿米卡星、卷曲霉素、莫西沙星、丙硫异烟胺、氯法齐明、利奈唑胺和利福布丁。对于丙硫异烟胺和莫西沙星,使用 MGIT960 法测试了各种建议的断点浓度。MGIT960 法比琼脂稀释法快 10 天得出结果。对于阿米卡星、卷曲霉素、利奈唑胺和利福布丁,所有方法的结果均完全一致。将莫西沙星的断点设定为 0.5μg/ml 时,结果与琼脂稀释法和基因分型法一致。对于丙硫异烟胺,仅在最低和最高 MIC 时观察到一致性。除了丙硫异烟胺,表型方法得出的结果基本一致。我们的研究支持以下 MGIT960 方法的断点:阿米卡星、利奈唑胺和氯法齐明为 1μg/ml,莫西沙星和利福布丁为 0.5μg/ml,卷曲霉素为 2.5μg/ml。此前没有为氯法齐明提出断点。对于丙硫异烟胺,似乎需要分为敏感、中介和耐药,尽管边界需要进一步研究。基因检测法是一种可靠和快速的方法,可用于预测氨基糖苷类和氟喹诺酮类耐药性。