Hospices Civils de Lyon, Rééducation Neurologique, Mouvement et Handicap, Hôpital Henry Gabrielle, Saint-Genis Laval; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Biologie Humaine, Faculté de Médecine, Lyon, France.
Neurology. 2010 Jul 20;75(3):246-52. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e8e8df. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
The present retrospective cohort study compares the long-term functional outcome, improvement or deterioration, of patients considered in a vegetative state (VS) or a minimally conscious state (MCS) 1 year after coma onset, then yearly for up to 5 years.
We reviewed the clinical courses of 12 patients in VS and 39 in MCS. The outcomes were assessed at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after injury using the 5 categories of the Glasgow Outcome Scale plus an additional category for patients in MCS. A logistic regression analysis investigated the relationships between each outcome and 10 predictor variables. Four of these variables were auditory evoked potentials recorded at the early stage of coma.
None of the patients in VS improved during the follow-up period: 1 was lost to follow-up, 9 died, and 2 remained in VS. Among patients in MCS, 3 were lost to follow-up, 14 died, 9 remained in MCS, and 13 emerged from MCS with severe disabilities. VS, age >39 years, and bilateral absence of cortical components of middle-latency auditory evoked potentials were significantly associated with deterioration.
In contrast to patients in VS, a third of patients in MCS improved more than 1 year after coma onset. This emphasizes the need to define reliable boundaries between VS and MCS using repeated clinical evaluations and all imaging and neurophysiologic tools available today.
本回顾性队列研究比较了昏迷发作 1 年后被认为处于植物状态(VS)或最小意识状态(MCS)的患者的长期功能结局,即改善或恶化,并在接下来的 5 年内每年进行一次评估。
我们回顾了 12 例 VS 患者和 39 例 MCS 患者的临床病程。使用格拉斯哥结局量表的 5 个类别以及 MCS 患者的额外类别,在损伤后 2、3、4 和 5 年评估结局。逻辑回归分析调查了每个结局与 10 个预测变量之间的关系。其中 4 个变量是昏迷早期记录的听觉诱发电位。
在随访期间,没有 VS 患者改善:1 例失访,9 例死亡,2 例仍处于 VS。在 MCS 患者中,3 例失访,14 例死亡,9 例仍处于 MCS,13 例从 MCS 中出现严重残疾。VS、年龄>39 岁和中潜伏期听觉诱发电位双侧皮质成分缺失与恶化显著相关。
与 VS 患者不同,三分之一的 MCS 患者在昏迷发作后 1 年以上有所改善。这强调了需要使用反复的临床评估和目前可用的所有影像学和神经生理学工具,在 VS 和 MCS 之间定义可靠的界限。