Suppr超能文献

储存的早产母乳与储存的足月母乳对促进极低出生体重儿生长发育的作用

Banked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants.

作者信息

Dempsey Eugene, Miletin Jan

机构信息

Neonatology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16(6):CD007644. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007644.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Human milk banking has been available in many countries for the last three decades. The milk provided from milk banking is predominantly term breast milk, but some milk banks provide preterm breast milk. There are a number of differences between donor term and donor preterm human milk.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of banked preterm milk compared with banked term milk regarding growth and developmental outcome in very low birth weight infants (infants weighing less than 1500 g).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, including a search of the Cochrane Neonatal Group specialized register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, January 2010). We searched the computerised bibliographic databases MEDLINE (1966 to February 2010), EMBASE (1988 to February 2010) and Web of Science (1975 to February 2010). We searched reference lists of all selected articles, review articles and the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials. We also searched abstracts from neonatal and pediatric meetings (PAS electronic version from 2000 to 2009, ESPR hand search from 2000 to 2009). We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing banked donor preterm milk with banked donor term milk regarding growth and developmental outcomes in very low birth weight infants

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We planned to perform assessment of methodology regarding blinding of randomisation, intervention and outcome measurements as well as completeness of follow-up. We planned to evaluate treatment effect using a fixed-effect model using relative risk (RR), relative risk reduction, risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) for categorical data and using mean, standard deviation and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous data. We planned an evaluation of heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies met the inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are no randomised trials that compare preterm banked milk to banked term milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants.

摘要

背景

在过去三十年里,许多国家都设有母乳库。母乳库提供的母乳主要是足月儿母乳,但也有一些母乳库提供早产儿母乳。捐赠的足月儿母乳和早产儿母乳存在诸多差异。

目的

确定与足月儿母乳库母乳相比,早产儿母乳库母乳对极低出生体重儿(体重小于1500克的婴儿)生长发育结局的影响。

检索策略

我们采用了Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准方法,包括检索Cochrane新生儿小组专门注册库和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,Cochrane图书馆,2010年1月)。我们检索了计算机化的书目数据库MEDLINE(1966年至2010年2月)、EMBASE(1988年至2010年2月)和科学引文索引(1975年至2010年2月)。我们检索了所有入选文章、综述文章以及围产期试验牛津数据库的参考文献列表。我们还检索了新生儿和儿科会议的摘要(2000年至2009年的PAS电子版,2000年至2009年的ESPR手工检索)。我们未设语言限制。

入选标准

比较早产儿母乳库母乳与足月儿母乳库母乳对极低出生体重儿生长发育结局影响的随机和半随机试验

数据收集与分析

我们计划对随机化、干预和结局测量的盲法以及随访完整性进行方法学评估。我们计划使用固定效应模型评估治疗效果,分类数据采用相对危险度(RR)、相对危险度降低率、危险差值(RD)和需治疗人数(NNT),连续数据采用均值、标准差和加权均数差值(WMD)。我们计划评估异质性。

主要结果

没有研究符合纳入标准。

作者结论

尚无随机试验比较早产儿母乳库母乳与足月儿母乳库母乳对极低出生体重儿生长发育的促进作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验