• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

历史对照单药治疗癫痫。

Historical control monotherapy design in the treatment of epilepsy.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, New York University, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2010 Oct;51(10):1936-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02650.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02650.x
PMID:20561024
Abstract

PURPOSE

Monotherapy approvals have been difficult to obtain from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and have almost all been achieved using a trial design entitled "withdrawal to monotherapy" in treatment-resistant patients, which employs a so-called "pseudo-placebo" as a comparator arm. The authors submitted a white paper to the FDA advocating use of a virtual placebo historical control as an alternative to pseudo-placebo. Such an approach reduces patient risk that would result from exposure to pseudo-placebo. In this article, we present the data submitted to the FDA to justify a historical control.

METHODS

We analyzed individual patient data from eight previously completed withdrawal to monotherapy studies, which we determined had similar design. All studies employed percent meeting predetermined exit criteria (denoting worsening of seizure control) as the outcome measure. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percent exiting were calculated at 112 days.

RESULTS

The percent meeting exit criteria were uniformly high, ranging from 74.9-95.9%. The eight studies appear to meet the criteria set forth for use of historical control. The estimate of the combined percent exit based on the noniterative mixed-effects model is 85.1%, with a lower bound of the 95% prediction interval of 65.3%, and 72.2% for an 80% prediction interval.

CONCLUSION

There is justification for proposing that these data can serve as a historical control for future monotherapy studies, obviating the need for a placebo/pseudo-placebo arm in trials intended to demonstrate the efficacy of approved drugs as monotherapy in treatment-resistant patients.

摘要

目的

从美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 获得单药治疗批准一直很困难,几乎所有批准都是在耐药患者中使用一种名为“撤药至单药治疗”的试验设计获得的,该设计采用所谓的“假性安慰剂”作为对照臂。作者向 FDA 提交了一份白皮书,主张使用虚拟安慰剂历史对照作为假性安慰剂的替代方法。这种方法降低了患者因接触假性安慰剂而面临的风险。在本文中,我们展示了提交给 FDA 的数据,以证明历史对照的合理性。

方法

我们分析了来自八项先前完成的撤药至单药治疗研究的个体患者数据,这些研究被确定具有相似的设计。所有研究均采用符合预定退出标准的患者百分比(表示癫痫控制恶化)作为主要终点。计算了 112 天时退出的百分比的 Kaplan-Meier 估计值。

结果

符合退出标准的百分比均很高,范围为 74.9-95.9%。这八项研究似乎符合提出使用历史对照的标准。基于非迭代混合效应模型的联合退出百分比估计值为 85.1%,95%预测区间的下限为 65.3%,80%预测区间为 72.2%。

结论

有理由提出这些数据可以作为未来单药治疗研究的历史对照,从而避免在旨在证明已批准药物作为耐药患者的单药治疗疗效的试验中需要安慰剂/假性安慰剂臂。

相似文献

1
Historical control monotherapy design in the treatment of epilepsy.历史对照单药治疗癫痫。
Epilepsia. 2010 Oct;51(10):1936-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02650.x.
2
When clinical trials make history: demonstrating efficacy of new antiepileptic drugs as monotherapy.当临床试验创造历史:证明新型抗癫痫药物作为单药治疗的疗效。
Epilepsia. 2010 Oct;51(10):1933-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02589.x.
3
Historical control withdrawal to monotherapy.历史对照撤药至单一疗法。
Epilepsy Res. 2006 Jan;68(1):74-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2005.09.027.
4
Historical data in the design and interpretation of trials with newly diagnosed patients.新诊断患者试验设计与解读中的历史数据。
Epilepsy Res. 2006 Jan;68(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2005.09.028.
5
Placebo-corrected efficacy of modern antiepileptic drugs for refractory epilepsy: reply to Beyenburg et al., 2009.现代抗癫痫药物治疗难治性癫痫的安慰剂校正疗效:对贝延伯格等人2009年文章的回复
Epilepsia. 2010 May;51(5):935-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02468.x.
6
Using the Internet to recruit patients for epilepsy trials: results of a New Zealand pilot study.利用互联网招募癫痫试验患者:新西兰试点研究结果。
Epilepsia. 2010 May;51(5):868-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02393.x. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
7
Monotherapy clinical trial design.单药治疗临床试验设计。
Neurology. 2007 Dec 11;69(24 Suppl 3):S23-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000302372.08983.38.
8
Toward rapproachment in the placebo control debate. A calculated compromise of power.走向安慰剂对照辩论中的和解。权力的精心妥协。
Eval Health Prof. 2003 Dec;26(4):404-14. doi: 10.1177/0163278703258106.
9
Active control trials for epilepsy: avoiding bias in head-to-head trials.癫痫的活性对照试验:避免头对头试验中的偏倚
Neurology. 2006 May 9;66(9):1294-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000218836.23697.f9.
10
Ethical considerations.伦理考量。
Epilepsy Res Suppl. 1993;10:137-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Demonstration of Group-Level and Individual-Level Efficacy Using Time-to-Event Designs for Clinical Trials of Antiseizure Medications.使用事件时间设计展示抗癫痫药物临床试验的群组水平和个体水平疗效。
Neurology. 2024 Aug 27;103(4):e209713. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209713. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
Time-to-event clinical trial designs: Existing evidence and remaining concerns.时间事件临床试验设计:现有证据和尚存问题。
Epilepsia. 2023 Jul;64(7):1699-1708. doi: 10.1111/epi.17621. Epub 2023 May 2.
3
Time to exceed pre-randomization monthly seizure count for perampanel in participants with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures: A potential clinical end point.
原发性全面性强直-阵挛发作患者中使用吡仑帕奈时超出每月预随机发作次数的时间:一个潜在的临床终点。
Epilepsia. 2022 Nov;63(11):2994-3004. doi: 10.1111/epi.17411. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
4
Clinical Trial Design for Disease-Modifying Therapies for Genetic Epilepsies.遗传性癫痫的疾病修饰疗法的临床试验设计。
Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Jul;18(3):1445-1457. doi: 10.1007/s13311-021-01123-5. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
Power gains by using external information in clinical trials are typically not possible when requiring strict type I error control.在临床试验中使用外部信息通常无法获得增益,因为需要严格控制Ⅰ类错误。
Biom J. 2020 Mar;62(2):361-374. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201800395. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
6
Serum sodium levels and related treatment-emergent adverse events during eslicarbazepine acetate use in adults with epilepsy.血清钠水平与艾司利卡西平在成人癫痫患者中的使用相关的治疗后不良事件。
Epilepsia. 2019 Jul;60(7):1341-1352. doi: 10.1111/epi.16069. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
7
From clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs to treatment.从抗癫痫药物的临床试验到治疗。
Epilepsia Open. 2018 Jul 10;3(Suppl Suppl 2):220-230. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12239. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
Prediction of efficacy for conversion from adjunctive therapy to monotherapy with eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg once daily for partial-onset epilepsy.
Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 27;9:65-72. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S133815. eCollection 2017.
9
Using phase II data for the analysis of phase III studies: An application in rare diseases.利用II期数据进行III期研究分析:在罕见病中的应用。
Clin Trials. 2017 Jun;14(3):277-285. doi: 10.1177/1740774517699409. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
10
Levetiracetam Clinical Pharmacokinetic Monitoring in Pediatric Patients with Epilepsy.左乙拉西坦在癫痫儿科患者中的临床药代动力学监测。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Nov;56(11):1267-1285. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0537-1.