Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012 Apr;22(2):259-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01155.x. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
Estimates of daily energy expenditure are important to studies of physical activity and energy balance. Objective measures are not always feasible and further research is needed to validate survey instruments and diaries. The study validates estimated activity energy expenditure (AEE) based on a 3-day diary protocol relative to AEE derived from uniaxial accelerometry in adolescents, 265 girls and 227 boys (12.5-16.4 years). Participants completed the diary and wore a GT1M Actigraph accelerometer on the same days. Height and weight were measured. Correlations between protocols were significant (P<0.001) but moderate, r=0.65 in males and r=0.69 in females. The highest correlation occurred among males on Friday, r=0.74 (P<0.01). Controlling for body mass, partial correlations between protocols decreased to 0.44 and 0.35 in males and females, respectively. About 97% of the cases fell within the limits of agreement in a Bland-Altman plot. The criterion of inclusion for the accelerometer excluded 18% of the initial sample. In summary, the 3-day diary was completed without any major problems and provided a reasonably valid alternative for assessing AEE. Concordance between methods was slightly lower for individuals with higher values of AEE.
每日能量消耗的估计对于体力活动和能量平衡的研究非常重要。客观的测量方法并不总是可行的,需要进一步研究来验证调查工具和日记。本研究验证了基于 3 天日记方案的估计活动能量消耗(AEE)与青少年(12.5-16.4 岁)单轴加速度计得出的 AEE 之间的相关性,共有 265 名女孩和 227 名男孩参与了研究。参与者在相同的日子里完成了日记并佩戴了 GT1M Actigraph 加速度计。身高和体重也进行了测量。两种方案之间的相关性具有统计学意义(P<0.001),但相关性适中,男性为 r=0.65,女性为 r=0.69。男性在周五时的相关性最高,r=0.74(P<0.01)。控制体重后,两种方案之间的部分相关性分别下降至男性为 0.44,女性为 0.35。在 Bland-Altman 图中,约 97%的病例落在了一致性界限内。加速度计的纳入标准排除了初始样本的 18%。总之,3 天日记的完成没有出现任何重大问题,并为评估 AEE 提供了一个合理有效的替代方案。对于 AEE 值较高的个体,两种方法的一致性略低。