Suppr超能文献

1 期癌症患者姑息治疗转诊时机和症状负担:回顾性队列研究。

Timing of palliative care referral and symptom burden in phase 1 cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2010 Sep 15;116(18):4402-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25389.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Phase 1 trials offer patients with advanced cancer the opportunity to pursue life-prolonging cancer treatments. In the current study, the timing of referral and symptom burden between patients referred to palliative care by phase 1 oncologists and those referred by non-phase 1 oncologists were compared.

METHODS

All 57 patients with advanced solid tumors who were referred by phase 1 oncologists to the palliative care outpatient clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) between 2007 and 2008 were included. The comparison cohort was comprised of 114 non-phase 1 patients who were stratified by age, sex, and cancer diagnosis in a 1:2 ratio. Information regarding patient characteristics, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), timing of referral, and survival was retrieved.

RESULTS

Both cohorts had the following matched characteristics: average age of 57 years, with 44% of the patients being female and 47% having gastrointestinal cancers. At the time of palliative care consultation, patients referred by phase 1 oncologists were more likely than patients referred by non-phase 1 oncologists to have a better performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1: 61% vs 36% [P = .003). The ESAS was not significantly different with the exception of better well-being in the phase 1 cohort (mean, 4.5 vs 5.5; P = .03). No difference was found for the duration between registration at MDACC and palliative care consultation (13 months vs 11 months; P = .41) and overall survival from the time of palliative care consultation (5 months vs 4 months; P = .69).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatients referred to palliative care by phase 1 oncologists were found to have a better performance status but similar symptom burden compared with patients referred by non-phase 1 oncologists. Patients with phase 1 involvement did not appear to have delayed palliative care referral compared with non-phase 1 patients. The results of the current study support the development of a simultaneous care model.

摘要

背景

1 期临床试验为晚期癌症患者提供了接受延长生命的癌症治疗的机会。在本研究中,比较了由 1 期肿瘤学家转介至姑息治疗的患者和由非 1 期肿瘤学家转介至姑息治疗的患者的转介时间和症状负担。

方法

所有 2007 年至 2008 年间由德克萨斯大学 MD 安德森癌症中心(MDACC)1 期肿瘤学家转介至姑息治疗门诊的 57 例晚期实体瘤患者均纳入本研究。对照组由按年龄、性别和癌症诊断以 1:2 比例分层的 114 例非 1 期患者组成。检索患者特征、埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS)、转介时间和生存信息。

结果

两组患者均具有以下匹配特征:平均年龄为 57 岁,44%为女性,47%患有胃肠道癌症。在姑息治疗咨询时,由 1 期肿瘤学家转介的患者比由非 1 期肿瘤学家转介的患者更有可能具有更好的表现状态(东部肿瘤协作组 0-1:61%比 36%[P=0.003])。ESAS 除了在 1 期组的生活质量更好(平均 4.5 比 5.5;P=0.03)外,差异无统计学意义。MDACC 登记和姑息治疗咨询之间的时间间隔(13 个月比 11 个月;P=0.41)和姑息治疗咨询后总生存时间(5 个月比 4 个月;P=0.69)无差异。

结论

与非 1 期肿瘤学家转介的患者相比,由 1 期肿瘤学家转介至姑息治疗的患者表现状态更好,但症状负担相似。与非 1 期患者相比,有 1 期参与的患者似乎没有延迟姑息治疗的转介。本研究的结果支持建立同时治疗模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b4/2936661/a02a75fd30ac/nihms-218115-f0001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Supportive Care: An Indispensable Component of Modern Oncology.支持性护理:现代肿瘤学不可或缺的组成部分。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2020 Nov;32(11):781-788. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验