Ghabashi Elham H, Sharaf Belal M, Kalaktawi Waheed A, Calacattawi Retaj, Calacattawi Abdullah W
Palliative Care, Ministry of Health, Jeddah, SAU.
Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, SAU.
Cureus. 2021 May 29;13(5):e15313. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15313.
Background Palliative care (PC) has a positive effect on symptom burden, quality of life, psychosocial communication, prognostic understanding, mood, and quality of care at the end of life of patients with advanced cancer. Objectives To investigate the timing of the first palliative consultation and referral of advanced cancer patients to the palliative care service and their determinants at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSHRC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Subjects and methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at KFSHRC. It included advanced cancer patients who died between January 1, 2019 and Jun 30, 2020. The dependent variable of primary interest is the timing of PC consultation and the timing of PC referral. The independent variables included age, sex, marital status, nationality, date of death, types of cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), palliative performance status (PPS), palliative prognostic index (PPI), code status (do not resuscitate [DNR]), the severity of symptoms (assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System - Revised [ESAS-r]), referral to home health care (HHC), referral to long-term care (LTC), referral to interdisciplinary team (IDT), length of survival after the first PC consultation, length of survival after the referral to the PC service, length of hospital stay, frequency of emergency room (ER) visits and hospital admission in the last year before death, and involvement in bereavement with advanced care planning (ACP) services. Results Of the 210 advanced cancer patients, 109 (51.9%) were male, and their ages ranged between 18 and 90 years. More than half of patients (56.7%) had a history of PC consultation. Among them, PC consultation was described as late in 60.5% of patients. Concerning the timing of palliative care referral among advanced cancer patients, it was too late and much too late among 25.7% and 58.1% of them, respectively. Patients who visited ER more frequently (≥3 times) (p=0.014) and those who referred to HHC (p=0.005) were more likely to consult PC early compared to their counterparts. Length of survival was significantly higher among patients who reported early PC consultation compared to those without PC consultation and those with late PC consultation, p<0.001. Referral to PC for both transfer of care and symptom management was associated with earlier PC consultation, p=0.021. Patients who were admitted to the hospital three times or more were less likely to be much too late referred to PC services, p=0.046. Also, patients who were not referred to long-term care or home health care were more likely to be referred to PC services much too late, p<0.001. Among 28.8% of patients whose PPS ranged between 30% and 50% compared to 14.9% of those whose PPS ranged between 10% and 20% expressed too late referral time to PC, p=0.040. Conclusion In a considerable proportion of terminal cancer patients, palliative care was consulted late, and the timing of palliative care referral was too late/much too late among most of those consulted palliative care. Length of survival was higher among patients who reported early PC consultation and who with ideal referral time to PC services than others. Therefore, future considerations to facilitate early integration of palliative care in cancer patients are highly recommended through mainly improving staff education in communication skills and palliative care approach.
背景 姑息治疗(PC)对晚期癌症患者生命末期的症状负担、生活质量、心理社会沟通、预后理解、情绪及护理质量具有积极影响。目的 调查沙特阿拉伯吉达法赫德国王专科医院及研究中心(KFSHRC)晚期癌症患者首次姑息治疗咨询及转介至姑息治疗服务的时机及其决定因素。对象与方法 在KFSHRC进行一项回顾性队列研究。纳入2019年1月1日至2020年6月30日期间死亡的晚期癌症患者。主要关注的因变量是姑息治疗咨询时机和姑息治疗转介时机。自变量包括年龄、性别、婚姻状况、国籍、死亡日期、癌症类型、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分、姑息治疗表现状态(PPS)、姑息预后指数(PPI)、代码状态(不要复苏[DNR])、症状严重程度(由埃德蒙顿症状评估系统修订版[ESAS-r]评估)、转介至家庭医疗保健(HHC)、转介至长期护理(LTC)、转介至跨学科团队(IDT)、首次姑息治疗咨询后的生存时长、转介至姑息治疗服务后的生存时长、住院时长、死亡前最后一年急诊室(ER)就诊频率和住院次数,以及参与临终关怀与高级护理计划(ACP)服务情况。结果 在210例晚期癌症患者中,109例(51.9%)为男性,年龄在18至90岁之间。超过半数患者(56.7%)有姑息治疗咨询史。其中,60.5%的患者被描述为咨询较晚。关于晚期癌症患者的姑息治疗转介时机,分别有25.7%和58.1%的患者转介过晚及过晚很多。与未频繁就诊急诊室(≥3次)(p=0.014)及未转介至家庭医疗保健(p=0.005)的患者相比,频繁就诊急诊室的患者及转介至家庭医疗保健的患者更有可能较早咨询姑息治疗。与未进行姑息治疗咨询及咨询较晚的患者相比,表示较早进行姑息治疗咨询的患者生存时长显著更长,p<0.001。因护理交接及症状管理转介至姑息治疗与较早的姑息治疗咨询相关,p=0.021。住院三次或以上的患者被转介至姑息治疗服务过晚很多的可能性较小,p=0.046。此外,未转介至长期护理或家庭医疗保健的患者被转介至姑息治疗服务过晚很多的可能性更大,p<0.001。PPS在30%至50%之间的患者中,28.8%表示转介至姑息治疗过晚,而PPS在10%至20%之间的患者中这一比例为14.9%,p=0.040。结论 在相当比例的晚期癌症患者中,姑息治疗咨询较晚,且在大多数接受姑息治疗咨询的患者中,姑息治疗转介时机过晚/过晚很多。与其他患者相比,较早进行姑息治疗咨询及转介至姑息治疗服务时机理想的患者生存时长更长。因此,强烈建议未来主要通过提高工作人员的沟通技巧和姑息治疗方法教育,促进姑息治疗尽早融入癌症患者的治疗过程。