Molecular and Population Genetics, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2010 Jun;20(3):277-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2010.05.005.
The case for identifying rare, disease-associated germline variants rather than undertaking larger genome-wide association (GWA) studies for common variants is increasingly being advocated. I agree with the importance of identifying rare variation in human disease, but believe more thought needs to be put into the limitations of such enterprises before advocating a dramatic departure from the GWA approach. In this paper, I discuss some of the main challenges in identifying rare disease variants with modest effects in disease, including: the over optimistic expectations about their effects; the need for very large studies needed to prove, beyond doubt, statistical associations; the problems associated with private variants, including the need for functional studies; the difficulties in prioritization of candidates for further validation and the issues related to the accurate estimation of the risk associated with individual rare variants. The rare variant approach is very promising, but it remains largely untested in comparison with the proven and successful GWA approach. Both strategies must continue to be pursued in parallel and their advantages and pitfalls must be considered without excessive scepticism or expectation.
越来越多的人主张,应该识别罕见的与疾病相关的种系变异,而不是进行更大规模的全基因组关联(GWA)研究来寻找常见变异。我同意识别人类疾病中罕见变异的重要性,但在倡导从 GWA 方法中明显偏离之前,我认为需要更多地考虑此类尝试的局限性。在本文中,我讨论了在具有中等疾病效应的罕见疾病变异中识别它们所面临的一些主要挑战,包括:对其效应的过分乐观的期望;需要进行非常大的研究,以毫无疑问地证明统计学关联;与私有变异相关的问题,包括对功能研究的需求;候选者进一步验证的优先级确定方面的困难,以及与个体罕见变异相关风险的准确估计相关的问题。罕见变异方法很有前途,但与经过验证和成功的 GWA 方法相比,它在很大程度上仍未得到检验。这两种策略都必须继续并行进行,并且必须在没有过度怀疑或期望的情况下考虑它们的优势和缺陷。