Logan T K, Walker Robert
Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40504, USA.
Violence Vict. 2010;25(3):332-48. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.25.3.332.
Many victims, victim advocates, and even law enforcement believe that protective orders are "just a piece of paper," suggesting that they do not work or are not effective. This study examined protective order effectiveness by following 210 women for 6 months after obtaining a protective order. There are four main themes that were identified from the study results. First, protective orders were not violated for half of the women in the sample during the 6-month follow-up period. Second, even among those who experienced violations, there were significant reductions in abuse and violence. Third, overall, women were less fearful of future harm from the PO partner at the 6-month follow-up, and a vast majority felt the protective order was fairly or extremely effective. Fourth, stalking emerges as a significant risk factor for protective order violations, sustained fear, and lower perceived effectiveness of the protective order. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
许多受害者、受害者权益倡导者,甚至执法人员都认为保护令“只是一张纸”,这意味着它们不起作用或没有效果。本研究通过在210名女性获得保护令后的6个月内对其进行跟踪,考察了保护令的有效性。从研究结果中确定了四个主要主题。第一,在6个月的随访期内,样本中一半的女性的保护令未被违反。第二,即使在那些经历过违反保护令情况的女性中,虐待和暴力行为也有显著减少。第三,总体而言,在6个月的随访中,女性对保护令对象未来伤害的恐惧降低了,绝大多数人认为保护令相当有效或极其有效。第四,跟踪骚扰成为保护令被违反、持续恐惧以及保护令有效性认知较低的一个重要风险因素。文中还讨论了对实践和未来研究的启示。