地区劣势与亲密伴侣杀人案：对北卡罗来纳州各县的生态分析（2004 - 2006年）
Area disadvantage and intimate partner homicide: an ecological analysis of North Carolina counties, 2004-2006.
作者信息
Madkour Aubrey Spriggs, Martin Sandra L, Halpern Carolyn Tucker, Schoenbach Victor J
机构信息
Department of Community Health Sciences, Tulane Uiversity School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
出版信息
Violence Vict. 2010;25(3):363-77. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.25.3.363.
Abstract
Using data from the North Carolina Violent Death Reporting System and other sources, we examined ecologic relationships between county (n = 100) disadvantage and intimate partner homicide (IPH), variability by victim gender and county urbanicity, and potential mediators. County disadvantage was related to female-victim homicide only in metropolitan counties (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.25); however, disadvantage was associated with male-victim IPH regardless of county urbanicity (IRR 1.17). None of the potential intervening variables examined (shelter availability, intimate partner violence services' funding) was supported as a mediator. Results suggest disparities across North Carolina counties in IPH according to county disadvantage. Future research should explore other potential mediators (i.e., service accessibility and law enforcement responses), as well as test the robustness of findings using additional years of data.
摘要
利用北卡罗来纳州暴力死亡报告系统及其他来源的数据，我们研究了县（n = 100）层面的劣势与亲密伴侣杀人案（IPH）之间的生态关系、按受害者性别及县城市化程度划分的差异以及潜在的中介因素。县层面的劣势仅在大都市县与女性受害者杀人案相关（发病率比[IRR]为1.25）；然而，无论县的城市化程度如何，劣势都与男性受害者的亲密伴侣杀人案相关（IRR为1.17）。所考察的潜在干预变量（避难所可及性、亲密伴侣暴力服务资金）均未被证实为中介因素。结果表明，北卡罗来纳州各县在亲密伴侣杀人案方面存在因县层面劣势导致的差异。未来的研究应探索其他潜在的中介因素（如服务可及性和执法反应），并使用更多年份的数据来检验研究结果的稳健性。
相似文献
1
Area disadvantage and intimate partner homicide: an ecological analysis of North Carolina counties, 2004-2006.地区劣势与亲密伴侣杀人案：对北卡罗来纳州各县的生态分析（2004 - 2006年）
Violence Vict. 2010;25(3):363-77. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.25.3.363.
2
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 34 States, Four California Counties, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2017.暴力死亡监测 - 国家暴力死亡报告系统，2017 年，34 个州、加利福尼亚州的 4 个县、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2020 Dec 4;69(8):1-37. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6908a1.
3
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 48 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2021.暴力死亡监测-2021 年全国暴力死亡报告系统，48 个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2024 Jul 11;73(5):1-44. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7305a1.
4
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 39 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2018.暴力死亡监测 - 国家暴力死亡报告系统，2018 年，39 个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022 Jan 28;71(3):1-44. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7103a1.
5
Deaths from violence in North Carolina, 2004: how deaths differ in females and males.2004年北卡罗来纳州的暴力致死情况：女性与男性死亡情况的差异
Inj Prev. 2006 Dec;12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii10-ii16. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.012617.
6
Surveillance for Violent Deaths -
National Violent Death Reporting System, 18 States, 2014.暴力死亡监测——国家暴力死亡报告系统，18 个州，2014 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Feb 2;67(2):1-36. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6702a1.
7
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 27 States, 2015.暴力死亡监测 - 国家暴力死亡报告系统，27 个州，2015 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Sep 28;67(11):1-32. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6711a1.
8
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 42 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2019.暴力死亡监测-全国暴力死亡报告系统，42 个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各，2019 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022 May 20;71(6):1-40. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7106a1.
9
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 17 States, 2013.暴力死亡监测 - 国家暴力死亡报告系统，17 个州，2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016 Aug 19;65(10):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6510a1.
10
Lethal domestic violence in eastern North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州东部的致命家庭暴力。
N C Med J. 2000 Sep-Oct;61(5):287-90.
引用本文的文献
1
Socio-demographic and psychosocial characteristics of male and female perpetrators in intimate partner homicide: A case-control study from Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.社会人口学和心理社会特征的男性和女性犯罪者在亲密伴侣杀人案: 来自瑞典西约特兰地区的病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 31;16(8):e0256064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256064. eCollection 2021.
2
A systematic review of socioeconomic status measurement in 13 years of U.S. injury research.13 年来美国伤害研究中社会经济地位测量的系统回顾。
J Safety Res. 2018 Feb;64:55-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.12.017. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
3
Does neighborhood environment differentiate intimate partner femicides from other femicides?邻里环境会使亲密伴侣间的女性谋杀案与其他女性谋杀案有所不同吗？
Violence Against Women. 2015 Jan;21(1):49-64. doi: 10.1177/1077801214564075. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
4
Neighborhood environment and intimate partner violence: a systematic review.邻里环境与亲密伴侣暴力：一项系统综述
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2015 Jan;16(1):16-47. doi: 10.1177/1524838013515758. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
5
Characteristics of the residential neighborhood environment differentiate intimate partner femicide in urban versus rural settings.居住环境的特点使得城乡环境下亲密伴侣女性杀害案件有所不同。
J Rural Health. 2013 Jun;29(3):281-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00448.x. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
6
Perpetration of intimate partner violence by young adult males: the association with alcohol outlet density and drinking behavior.年轻男性实施亲密伴侣暴力行为：与酒精销售点密度和饮酒行为的关联。
Health Place. 2013 May;21:10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
7
Troubled times, troubled relationships: how economic resources, gender beliefs, and neighborhood disadvantage influence intimate partner violence.困境时期，困境关系：经济资源、性别观念和邻里劣势如何影响亲密伴侣暴力。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 Jul;28(10):2134-55. doi: 10.1177/0886260512471083. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
8
Violence victimization of young men in heterosexual relationships: does alcohol outlet density influence outcomes?异性恋关系中年轻男性遭受暴力侵害的情况：酒类销售点密度会影响结果吗？
Violence Vict. 2012;27(4):527-47. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.27.4.527.
本文引用的文献
1
Intimate partner homicide: review and implications of research and policy.亲密伴侣杀人案：研究与政策回顾及影响
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2007 Jul;8(3):246-69. doi: 10.1177/1524838007303505.
2
Deaths from violence in North Carolina, 2004: how deaths differ in females and males.2004年北卡罗来纳州的暴力致死情况：女性与男性死亡情况的差异
Inj Prev. 2006 Dec;12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii10-ii16. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.012617.
3
A practical approach to public health surveillance of violent deaths related to intimate partner relationships.一种针对与亲密伴侣关系相关暴力死亡的公共卫生监测实用方法。
Public Health Rep. 2006 Jul-Aug;121(4):393-9. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100407.
4
Average cost per person victimized by an intimate partner of the opposite gender: a comparison of men and women.遭受异性亲密伴侣侵害的人均平均成本：男性与女性的比较。
Violence Vict. 2005 Aug;20(4):379-91.
5
To leave or to stay?: Battered women's concern for vulnerable pets.离开还是留下？受虐妇女对弱势宠物的担忧。
J Interpers Violence. 2003 Dec;18(12):1367-77. doi: 10.1177/0886260503258028.
6
Surveillance for homicide among intimate partners--United States, 1981-1998.1981 - 1998年美国亲密伴侣间杀人案件监测
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2001 Oct 12;50(3):1-15.
7
Social context of sexual relationships among rural African Americans.美国农村非裔美国人恋爱关系中的社会背景
Sex Transm Dis. 2001 Feb;28(2):69-76. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200102000-00002.
8
Neighborhood poverty as a predictor of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States: a multilevel analysis.美国白种人、黑种人和西班牙裔夫妇中邻里贫困作为亲密伴侣暴力预测因素的多层次分析
Ann Epidemiol. 2000 Jul;10(5):297-308. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00052-1.
9
Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy.社区与暴力犯罪：集体效能的多层次研究
Science. 1997 Aug 15;277(5328):918-24. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5328.918.
10
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.社会心理学研究中的调节变量与中介变量区分：概念、策略及统计考量
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.
Zotero 插件