Taylor E A, Jackman P J, Phillips I
Division of Microbiology, UMDS, St Thomas's Campus, London.
J Med Microbiol. 1991 Jun;34(6):339-48. doi: 10.1099/00222615-34-6-339.
Conventional biochemical and antibiotic sensitivity tests were used to allocate 87 clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-positive cocci to currently recognised species, in comparison with type and other authentic reference strains. Whole-cell protein electrophoresis was then performed with extracts of each strain. Allowing for difficulties of standardisation, it was possible to allocate most of the organisms to species-related groups on the basis of protein patterns. Organisms identified conventionally as Peptostreptococcus anaerobius and P. micros formed homogeneous groups by protein electrophoresis. There was evidence for heterogeneity amongst strains identified as P. asaccharolyticus (two groups, including P. indolicus), P. prevotii and P. magnus. However, aberrant P. prevotii strains were allocated to the P. asaccharolyticus groups, leaving a homogeneous P. prevotii group, and if P. variabilis were re-instated as a species, the remaining P. magnus strains could be divided into two groups. Of the anaerobic gram-positive cocci in the National Collection of Type Cultures deposited by Hare, Group IV is P. magnus, Group IX is P. micros and Groups I, III and VIII appear to be related to the butyrate-producing species P. asaccharolyticus and P. prevotii, but are strongly saccharolytic.
与模式菌株及其他可靠参考菌株相比,采用传统生化及抗生素敏感性试验将87株临床分离的厌氧革兰氏阳性球菌归类到目前公认的菌种中。随后对各菌株提取物进行全细胞蛋白电泳。尽管标准化存在困难,但根据蛋白图谱仍有可能将大多数菌株归类到与菌种相关的组中。传统鉴定为厌氧消化链球菌和微小消化链球菌的菌株通过蛋白电泳形成了同质组。有证据表明,在鉴定为不解糖消化链球菌(包括产吲哚消化链球菌在内的两个组)、普氏消化链球菌和大消化链球菌的菌株中存在异质性。然而,异常的普氏消化链球菌菌株被归类到不解糖消化链球菌组中,从而留下了一个同质的普氏消化链球菌组,并且如果可变消化链球菌重新被认定为一个菌种,那么其余的大消化链球菌菌株可分为两组。在哈雷保藏于国家典型培养物保藏中心的厌氧革兰氏阳性球菌中,第四组是大消化链球菌,第九组是微小消化链球菌,第一、三、八组似乎与产丁酸的不解糖消化链球菌和普氏消化链球菌有关,但具有较强的解糖能力。