Suppr超能文献

革兰氏阳性厌氧球菌的实验室鉴定

The laboratory identification of gram-positive anaerobic cocci.

作者信息

Murdoch D A, Mitchelmore I J

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London.

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 1991 May;34(5):295-308. doi: 10.1099/00222615-34-5-295.

Abstract

A collection of 256 clinical strains and 40 reference strains of gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC) was studied, to characterise the recognised species more fully and to define groups of strains which might correspond to previously undescribed species. The methods used were: gas-liquid chromatography (GLC) for the detection of volatile fatty acids (VFAs); determination of the pre-formed enzyme profile with a commercially available kit, ATB 32A; microscopic appearance; colonial morphology; and antibiotic sensitivity tests. Strains were placed in one of five VFA groups according to their GLC profile; 96% of strains were further assigned to 12 groups by their enzyme profile. There was less than 99% agreement between the two methods. Of 111 clinical strains in the VFA-negative group, 110 gave one of three distinct enzyme profiles corresponding to Peptostreptococcus magnus, P. micros and P. heliotrinreducens. The assignment of strains to groups based on their microscopic appearance and colonial morphology agreed well with groupings according to enzyme profile. Identification of butyrate-producing GPAC was unsatisfactory because it relied heavily on the enzyme profile; testing for indole production was of limited discriminative value. Most strains of P. asaccharolyticus and P. indolicus were very similar in enzyme profile, microscopic appearance and colonial morphology, but a sub-group of P. asaccharolyticus could be distinguished. A further indole-positive group corresponding to Hare group III was also noted. Strains of P. prevotii and P. tetradius were very similar, but easily distinguished from other butyrate-producing GPAC. However, 45% of the butyrate-producing cocci could not be assigned to recognised species; most of these were assigned to one of two new groups, the ADH group and the bGAL group, by their enzyme profile, microscopic appearance and smell. Four strains that produced a terminal VFA peak of isovaleric acid formed a new group designated 'ivoricus'. Reliable features for the identification of P. anaerobius were GLC (all GPAC that produced isocaproic acid were identified as P. anaerobius), enzyme profile and sensitivity to SPS. Two clinical strains that produced caproci acid were identified as Hare group VIII; they were distinguished from Peptococcus niger by their enzyme profile and colonial morphology. A phenotypic classification based on GLC and enzyme profile is presented, with a method for the identification of most strains of GPAC within 48 h of primary isolation.

摘要

对256株临床菌株和40株革兰氏阳性厌氧球菌(GPAC)参考菌株进行了研究,以更全面地描述已确认的菌种,并确定可能对应于先前未描述菌种的菌株组。所使用的方法包括:气液色谱法(GLC)检测挥发性脂肪酸(VFA);使用市售试剂盒ATB 32A测定预先形成的酶谱;显微镜下外观;菌落形态;以及抗生素敏感性测试。根据GLC谱,菌株被分为五个VFA组之一;96%的菌株根据其酶谱进一步分为12组。两种方法之间的一致性低于99%。在VFA阴性组的111株临床菌株中,110株呈现出与大消化链球菌、微小消化链球菌和氢化嗜黑素消化链球菌相对应的三种不同酶谱之一。根据显微镜下外观和菌落形态对菌株进行分组,与根据酶谱分组的结果吻合良好。对产丁酸的GPAC的鉴定并不理想,因为它严重依赖于酶谱;吲哚产生检测的鉴别价值有限。大多数解糖消化链球菌和产吲哚消化链球菌菌株在酶谱、显微镜下外观和菌落形态上非常相似,但解糖消化链球菌的一个亚组可以区分出来。还发现了一个对应于Hare第三组的吲哚阳性组。普氏消化链球菌和四联消化链球菌菌株非常相似,但很容易与其他产丁酸的GPAC区分开来。然而,45%的产丁酸球菌无法归为已确认的菌种;其中大多数根据其酶谱、显微镜下外观和气味被分为两个新组之一,即ADH组和bGAL组。产生异戊酸末端VFA峰的四株菌株形成了一个新组,命名为“ivoricus”。鉴定厌氧消化链球菌的可靠特征是GLC(所有产生异己酸的GPAC都被鉴定为厌氧消化链球菌)、酶谱和对SPS的敏感性。两株产生己酸的临床菌株被鉴定为Hare第八组;它们通过酶谱和菌落形态与黑消化球菌区分开来。提出了一种基于GLC和酶谱的表型分类方法,以及一种在初次分离后48小时内鉴定大多数GPAC菌株的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验