Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain.
Bipolar Disord. 2010 May;12(3):230-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00815.x.
To evaluate the antimanic efficacy and safety of paliperidone extended-release (ER) tablets in patients with bipolar I disorder.
This study included a 3-week, double-blind, acute treatment phase (paliperidone ER versus placebo, with quetiapine as control), and a 9-week, double-blind, maintenance phase (paliperidone ER versus quetiapine). Patients [n = 493; Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score >or= 20] were randomized (2:2:1) to flexibly dosed paliperidone ER (3-12 mg/day), quetiapine (400-800 mg/day), or placebo for the acute treatment phase. During the maintenance phase, patients assigned to placebo were switched to paliperidone ER but not included in analysis of efficacy.
Paliperidone ER was superior to placebo at the 3-week endpoint {primary outcome; least-squares mean difference in change from baseline in YMRS scores [95% confidence interval (CI)]: -5.5 (-7.57; -3.35); p < 0.001} and noninferior to quetiapine at the 12-week endpoint [least-squares mean difference (95% CI): 1.7 (-0.47; 3.96)]. The median mode dose during the 12-week treatment period was 9 mg for paliperidone ER and 600 mg for quetiapine. The most common (>or= 10%) treatment-emergent adverse events during the 12-week period were: headache (16%), somnolence (10%), and akathisia (10%) for paliperidone ER; somnolence (21%), sedation and dry mouth (17% each), headache (14%), and dizziness (13%) for quetiapine. Body weight increase >or= 7% from baseline to 12-week endpoint was 8% with paliperidone ER and 17% with quetiapine. A higher percentage of paliperidone ER (13.9%) versus quetiapine patients (7.5%) 'switched to depression' at the12-week endpoint.
Paliperidone ER (3-12 mg/day) was efficacious and tolerable in the treatment of acute mania.
评估帕利哌酮长效片(ER)治疗双相 I 型障碍患者的抗躁狂疗效和安全性。
本研究包括 3 周双盲急性治疗期(帕利哌酮 ER 与安慰剂比较,喹硫平作为对照)和 9 周双盲维持治疗期(帕利哌酮 ER 与喹硫平比较)。[Young Mania Rating Scale(YMRS)评分≥20]的 493 例患者被随机(2:2:1)分为灵活剂量帕利哌酮 ER(3-12mg/天)、喹硫平(400-800mg/天)或安慰剂治疗急性治疗期。在维持治疗期,安慰剂组患者换用帕利哌酮 ER,但不纳入疗效分析。
帕利哌酮 ER 在治疗 3 周的主要终点[YMRS 评分自基线变化的最小二乘均数差值(95%置信区间):-5.5(-7.57;-3.35);p<0.001]优于安慰剂,在 12 周的次要终点也优于喹硫平[最小二乘均数差值(95%置信区间):1.7(-0.47;3.96)]。治疗 12 周期间帕利哌酮 ER 的中位数模式剂量为 9mg,喹硫平为 600mg。12 周期间最常见(发生率≥10%)的治疗期不良事件为:帕利哌酮 ER 为头痛(16%)、嗜睡(10%)和静坐不能(10%);喹硫平为嗜睡(21%)、镇静和口干(各 17%)、头痛(14%)和头晕(13%)。与基线相比,治疗 12 周终点时体重增加≥7%的患者中,帕利哌酮 ER 为 8%,喹硫平为 17%。帕利哌酮 ER 组(13.9%)较喹硫平组(7.5%)在 12 周终点时更易“转为抑郁”。
帕利哌酮 ER(3-12mg/天)治疗急性躁狂症有效且耐受性良好。