Cognis GmbH, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Contact Dermatitis. 2010 Mar;62(3):157-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01656.x.
Development of cosmetic products and household detergents necessitates comparative study designs to assess the skin tolerance of products. In initial tests, the epicutaneous patch test for irritation is widely used.
This study was conducted to develop a protocol that would facilitate a comparison of results obtained when tests are conducted by different laboratories.
'In-house' and standardized patch test protocols were used to assess irritation potentials of surfactant-based products in intra- and interlaboratory studies using defined surfactant samples.
The various in-house protocols tested did not consistently produce equivalent results. In order to develop a study design that yields comparable results, various factors were identified and adjusted. The standardized study protocol includes occlusive application of 70 microl of the test substance to the back of 30 subjects, defined reading times and schemes, assessments based mainly on erythema, and inclusion of sodium laureth sulfate and sodium dodecyl sulfate as positive controls as well as water as a negative control.
Use of the standardized protocol and training of assessors improved the reliability and consistency of results whereby the irritation potentials of the references and test samples were ranked similarly by the laboratories.
化妆品和家用清洁剂的开发需要进行比较研究设计,以评估产品的皮肤耐受性。在初始测试中,广泛使用经皮贴片试验来评估刺激性。
本研究旨在制定一种方案,方便比较不同实验室进行测试时获得的结果。
使用“内部”和标准化的斑贴试验方案,使用定义的表面活性剂样品,在实验室内部和实验室间研究中评估基于表面活性剂的产品的刺激性潜力。
测试的各种内部方案并未始终产生等效结果。为了开发一种产生可比结果的研究设计,确定并调整了各种因素。标准化研究方案包括将 70 微升测试物质封闭应用于 30 名受试者的背部,定义的读取时间和方案,主要基于红斑进行评估,并包括月桂醇聚醚硫酸酯钠和十二烷基硫酸钠作为阳性对照以及水作为阴性对照。
使用标准化方案和评估员培训提高了结果的可靠性和一致性,从而使参考物质和测试样品的刺激性潜力被各实验室以相似的方式进行了排序。