• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生巾在敏感皮肤和正常皮肤人群中的累积皮肤刺激性试验。

Cumulative skin irritation test of sanitary pads in sensitive skin and normal skin population.

作者信息

Farage Miranda A, Maibach Howard

机构信息

The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio 45224, USA.

出版信息

Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2007;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.1080/15569520601183831.

DOI:10.1080/15569520601183831
PMID:17464747
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We performed a randomized, paired, double-blind trial involving 14 participants with self-declared normal skin and 15 participants with self-declared sensitive skin to test the cutaneous compatibility of materials of low irritation potential for skin irritation (sanitary pads) elicited by repetitive topical application.

METHODS

Two test products patches and two control substance patches were applied to the lateral aspect of the upper arm once daily under fully occlusive conditions for 4 days. The positive control patch was moistened with sodium lauryl sulphate (0.1% w/v) and the negative control patch was moistened with 0.9% sodium chloride, as were the two test material patches. The patches were removed, skin irritation (erythema) graded, and new patches applied after each 24-hour period.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in skin irritation from the test patches between the sensitive and normal skin groups. The two test patches and the negative control patch were significantly less irritating than the positive control in both test groups. Both test patches were comparable to the negative control patch in the normal and sensitive skin groups.

CONCLUSION

The test materials produced similar degrees of skin irritation among both groups. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in skin compatibility when the two feminine hygiene product test patches were worn by self-declared normal and sensitive skin groups.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项随机、配对、双盲试验,纳入了14名自称皮肤正常的参与者和15名自称皮肤敏感的参与者,以测试反复局部应用引起皮肤刺激(卫生棉片)的低刺激性材料的皮肤相容性。

方法

在完全封闭的条件下,每天在上臂外侧贴两片测试产品贴片和两片对照物质贴片,持续4天。阳性对照贴片用十二烷基硫酸钠(0.1% w/v)湿润,阴性对照贴片用0.9%氯化钠湿润,两片测试材料贴片也是如此。每24小时更换贴片,去除贴片后对皮肤刺激(红斑)进行分级。

结果

敏感皮肤组和正常皮肤组的测试贴片引起的皮肤刺激无显著差异。在两个测试组中,两片测试贴片和阴性对照贴片的刺激性均明显低于阳性对照。在正常皮肤组和敏感皮肤组中,两片测试贴片与阴性对照贴片相当。

结论

两组中测试材料引起的皮肤刺激程度相似。总体而言,自称皮肤正常和敏感的两组佩戴两种女性卫生用品测试贴片时,皮肤相容性无统计学显著差异。

相似文献

1
Cumulative skin irritation test of sanitary pads in sensitive skin and normal skin population.卫生巾在敏感皮肤和正常皮肤人群中的累积皮肤刺激性试验。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2007;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.1080/15569520601183831.
2
Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products.评估传统斑贴试验的改良方法在评估女性卫生用品化学刺激潜力方面的作用。
Skin Res Technol. 2004 May;10(2):73-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2004.00054.x.
3
Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.开发一种灵敏的测试方法,以评估对粘膜皮肤的机械刺激潜力。
Skin Res Technol. 2004 May;10(2):85-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2004.00055.x.
4
Cumulative irritation patch test of sanitary pads on sensitive skin.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2005 Sep;4(3):179-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2005.00307.x.
5
The Behind-the-Knee test: an efficient model for evaluating mechanical and chemical irritation.腘窝试验:一种评估机械性和化学性刺激的有效模型。
Skin Res Technol. 2006 May;12(2):73-82. doi: 10.1111/j.0909-752X.2006.00184.x.
6
Comparative assessment of the acute skin irritation potential of detergent formulations using a novel human 4-h patch test method.使用一种新型人体4小时贴片试验方法对洗涤剂配方的急性皮肤刺激性进行比较评估。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2005 Dec;43(12):1703-12. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2005.05.012.
7
The study of human skin irritation of a novel herbal skin care product and ingredients by human single closed patch testing.通过人体单次封闭性斑贴试验对一种新型草本护肤品及其成分进行人体皮肤刺激性研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Jun;90(6):1116-22.
8
Irritancy ranking of 31 cleansers in the Indian market in a 24-h patch test.在一项24小时斑贴试验中对印度市场上31种洁面产品的刺激性排名。
Int J Cosmet Sci. 2008 Aug;30(4):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00448.x.
9
Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.通过用十二烷基硫酸钠进行常规斑贴试验评估皮肤对刺激物的敏感性。
Eur J Dermatol. 2001 Sep-Oct;11(5):416-9.
10
Human scalp irritation compared to that of the arm and back.与手臂和背部相比,人体头皮的刺激性。
Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Oct;51(4):196-200. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00439.x.

引用本文的文献

1
[Neuropeptides and their receptors as a molecular explanation for sensitive skin].[神经肽及其受体作为敏感性皮肤的分子解释]
Hautarzt. 2011 Dec;62(12):893-9. doi: 10.1007/s00105-011-2208-8.