• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期剖宫产手术时机对健康的影响。

Health implications resulting from the timing of elective cesarean delivery.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, HaEmek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.

出版信息

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 Jun 21;8:68. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-68.

DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-8-68
PMID:20565934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2902487/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The literature is nearly unanimous in recommending elective cesarean delivery at 39 weeks of gestation because of the lower rates of neonatal respiratory complications compared to 38 weeks. However, elective cesarean delivery at 39 weeks or more may have maternal and other fetal consequences compared to delivery at 38 weeks, which are not always addressed in these studies.

DISCUSSION

Between 38 and 39 weeks of gestation, approximately 10% - 14% of women go into spontaneous labor; meaning that a considerable number of women scheduled for an elective cesarean delivery at 39 weeks will deliver earlier in an unscheduled, frequently emergency, cesarean delivery. The incidence of maternal morbidity and mortality is higher among women undergoing non-elective cesarean deliveries than among those undergoing elective ones. Complications may be greater among women after numerous repeat cesarean deliveries and among older women. Other than reducing the frequency of non-elective cesarean deliveries, bringing forward the timing of elective cesarean delivery to 38 weeks, may occasionally prevent intrauterine fetal demise which has been shown to increase with increasing gestational age and to avoid other fetal consequences related to the emergency delivery. All these considerations need to be weighed against the medical and the economic impact of the increase in neonatal morbidity resulting from births at 38 weeks compared to 39 weeks.

SUMMARY

Until prospective randomized trials are conducted, we are unlikely to be able to precisely answer all risk:benefit questions as to the best timing of scheduled elective cesarean delivery. Older women, and women with numerous prior cesarean deliveries, are of particular concern. It is reasonable to inform the pregnant women of the risk of each of the above options and to respect her autonomy and decision-making.

摘要

背景

文献几乎一致推荐在 39 孕周行择期剖宫产,因为与 38 孕周相比,新生儿呼吸并发症的发生率更低。然而,与 38 孕周分娩相比,39 周或以上行择期剖宫产可能会对产妇和其他胎儿产生影响,但这些研究并未充分讨论这些影响。

讨论

在 38 至 39 孕周之间,约 10%-14%的女性会自发分娩;这意味着相当数量的计划在 39 孕周行择期剖宫产的女性会提前进入无计划的紧急剖宫产。与择期剖宫产相比,非择期剖宫产的产妇发病率和死亡率更高。对于多次重复剖宫产的女性和年龄较大的女性,并发症可能更大。除了降低非择期剖宫产的发生率外,将择期剖宫产的时间提前到 38 孕周,可能偶尔会预防胎儿宫内死亡,因为随着胎龄的增加,胎儿宫内死亡的风险增加,并避免与紧急分娩相关的其他胎儿后果。所有这些考虑因素都需要权衡与 38 孕周分娩相比,38 孕周分娩导致的新生儿发病率增加对医疗和经济的影响。

总结

在进行前瞻性随机试验之前,我们不太可能能够准确回答有关最佳择期剖宫产时间的所有风险效益问题。年龄较大的女性和有多次剖宫产史的女性尤其需要关注。告知孕妇上述每种选择的风险是合理的,并尊重她的自主权和决策。

相似文献

1
Health implications resulting from the timing of elective cesarean delivery.择期剖宫产手术时机对健康的影响。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 Jun 21;8:68. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-68.
2
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.39周选择性剖宫产:对肩难产、胎儿创伤、新生儿脑病及胎儿宫内死亡的影响
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009.
3
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
4
A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section.既往有剖宫产史的产妇在妊娠38周与39周择期剖宫产时自然分娩率的比较研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jul;99 Suppl 4:S37-41.
5
Timing of cesarean delivery in women with ≥2 previous cesarean deliveries.有≥2 次剖宫产史的孕妇行剖宫产术的时机。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;226(1):110.e1-110.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.018. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
6
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
7
Timing of elective cesarean delivery at term and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes among Thai and other Southeast Asian pregnant women.足月择期剖宫产的时机及其对泰国和其他东南亚孕妇母婴结局的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Aug;42(8):936-43. doi: 10.1111/jog.13016. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
8
Impact of cesarean section in a private health service in Brazil: indications and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates.剖宫产对巴西一家私立医疗服务机构的影响:指征以及新生儿发病率和死亡率
Ceska Gynekol. 2018 Winter;83(1):4-10.
9
Optimal timing of elective repeat cesarean deliveries of term singleton pregnancies: A multicenter cross-sectional study.择期再次剖宫产行足月单胎妊娠的最佳时机:一项多中心横断面研究。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar;61(2):317-322. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.02.021.
10
Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.是否选择剖宫产?产妇年龄与足月时不良结局风险:一项基于人群的低风险初产妇登记研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 17;16:230. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1028-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review on the effectiveness of implementation strategies to postpone elective caesarean sections to ≥ 39 + (0-6) weeks of gestation.系统评价延迟择期剖宫产至≥39+(0-6)周妊娠的实施策略的有效性。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 14;10(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01718-1.
2
A systematic review and time-response meta-analysis of the optimal timing of elective caesarean sections for best maternal and neonatal health outcomes.系统评价和时间反应荟萃分析择期剖宫产的最佳时机,以获得最佳母婴健康结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03036-1.
3
(Update of a) systematic review on the impact of elective early term (< 39th gestational week) caesarean sections on maternal and neonatal health - a protocol.(更新版)选择性早期限(<39 孕周)剖宫产对母婴健康影响的系统评价-方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 16;7(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0787-5.
4
Risk of Emergency Operations, Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes according to the Planned Gestational Age for Cesarean Delivery.根据剖宫产计划的胎龄,手术风险、产妇和新生儿不良结局的风险。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Feb 12;33(7):e51. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e51.
5
Shifting Patterns in Cesarean Delivery Scheduling and Timing in Oregon before and after a Statewide Hard Stop Policy.俄勒冈州在全州范围内实行硬性停止政策前后剖宫产分娩计划和时机的变化模式。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2839-2857. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12797. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
6
Optimal Timing of Delivery among Low-Risk Women with Prior Caesarean Section: A Secondary Analysis of the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health.既往剖宫产的低风险女性的最佳分娩时机:世界卫生组织孕产妇和新生儿健康多国调查的二次分析
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0149091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149091. eCollection 2016.
7
Incidence and determinants of neonatal morbidity after elective caesarean section at the national referral hospital in Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉市国家转诊医院择期剖宫产术后新生儿发病情况及影响因素
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 30;8:624. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1617-7.
8
Trend in major neonatal and maternal morbidities accompanying the rise in the cesarean delivery rate.随着剖宫产率上升,主要新生儿及孕产妇发病率的变化趋势。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 29;5:12565. doi: 10.1038/srep12565.
9
Safety and efficacy of airbag midwifery in promoting normal vaginal delivery and reducing caesarean section.气囊助产术在促进正常阴道分娩及减少剖宫产方面的安全性与有效性。
Iran J Reprod Med. 2012 Nov;10(6):595-600.
10
Varying gestational age patterns in cesarean delivery: an international comparison.剖宫产分娩中不同孕周模式的国际比较。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Sep 13;14:321. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-321.

本文引用的文献

1
Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes.足月择期再次剖宫产的时机与新生儿结局
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):111-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803267.
2
Advanced maternal age. Part I: obstetric complications.高龄孕产妇。第一部分:产科并发症。
Am J Perinatol. 2008 Sep;25(8):521-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1085620. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
3
Bladder injuries during cesarean section in a University Hospital: a 25-year review.某大学医院剖宫产术中膀胱损伤情况:一项为期25年的回顾性研究
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Mar;279(3):349-52. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0733-1. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
4
Severe maternal morbidity and the mode of delivery.严重孕产妇发病情况与分娩方式
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(6):662-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802108763.
5
Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study.择期剖宫产分娩足月儿的呼吸道疾病发病风险:队列研究
BMJ. 2008 Jan 12;336(7635):85-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39405.539282.BE. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
6
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.39周选择性剖宫产:对肩难产、胎儿创伤、新生儿脑病及胎儿宫内死亡的影响
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009.
7
Postpartum urinary incontinence: a comparison of vaginal delivery, elective, and emergent cesarean section.产后尿失禁:阴道分娩、择期剖宫产与急诊剖宫产的比较
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Nov;17(6):631-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0085-y. Epub 2006 Mar 28.
8
Iatrogenic fetal injury.
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;106(5 Pt 2):1172-4. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000164071.18681.48.
9
Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.既往剖宫产术后试产相关的母儿结局
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 16;351(25):2581-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040405. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
10
Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome.高龄孕产妇与不良围产期结局
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;104(4):727-33. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000140682.63746.be.