• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据剖宫产计划的胎龄,手术风险、产妇和新生儿不良结局的风险。

Risk of Emergency Operations, Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes according to the Planned Gestational Age for Cesarean Delivery.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Feb 12;33(7):e51. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e51.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e51
PMID:29359538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5785626/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the risk of emergency cesarean deliveries (CDs) and adverse neonatal/maternal outcomes according to the planned gestational age at delivery (GAD) for elective CD.

METHODS

The study population consisted of term singleton pregnant women who were booked for elective CD and were subsequently delivered at term by CD, after excluding cases with a trial of labor. The relationship between the planned GAD, risk of emergency CD prior to planned date, and adverse neonatal/maternal outcomes were determined.

RESULTS

The frequency of emergency CD, adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes were 9.5%, 4.5%, and 5.9%, respectively. The risk of emergency CD prior to the planned delivery date increased significantly according to the planned GAD (5.8% at 37 weeks, 8.2% at 38 weeks, 13.6% at 39 weeks, and 26.7% at 40 weeks or more of planned GAD, P = 0.005). Emergency CD was associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes, whereas the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes did not differ. In the total study population including both cases with elective and emergency CD, the risk of adverse maternal outcomes did not increase according to the planned GAD, and the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes decreased significantly according to the planned GAD.

CONCLUSION

The risk of emergency CD increased as the planned GAD increased, but the risk of adverse maternal outcomes did not increase and the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes decreased significantly according to the planned GAD in the total study population including elective/emergency CD.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估根据择期剖宫产(CD)的计划分娩孕周(GAD)评估紧急 CD 及不良新生儿/产妇结局的风险。

方法

研究人群为择期 CD 并随后足月经 CD 分娩的单胎足月孕妇,排除试产病例。确定计划 GAD 与计划日期前紧急 CD 的风险以及不良新生儿/产妇结局之间的关系。

结果

紧急 CD、不良新生儿和产妇结局的发生率分别为 9.5%、4.5%和 5.9%。根据计划 GAD,紧急 CD 的风险显著增加(37 周时为 5.8%,38 周时为 8.2%,39 周时为 13.6%,40 周或以上时为 26.7%,P=0.005)。紧急 CD 与产妇不良结局风险增加相关,而与新生儿不良结局风险无关。在包括择期和紧急 CD 的总研究人群中,根据计划 GAD,产妇不良结局风险并未增加,而新生儿不良结局风险显著降低。

结论

在包括择期/紧急 CD 的总研究人群中,随着计划 GAD 的增加,紧急 CD 的风险增加,但产妇不良结局风险并未增加,而新生儿不良结局风险显著降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e40/5785626/9b7bb8f920cf/jkms-33-e51-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e40/5785626/9b7bb8f920cf/jkms-33-e51-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e40/5785626/9b7bb8f920cf/jkms-33-e51-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk of Emergency Operations, Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes according to the Planned Gestational Age for Cesarean Delivery.根据剖宫产计划的胎龄,手术风险、产妇和新生儿不良结局的风险。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Feb 12;33(7):e51. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e51.
2
Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.是否选择剖宫产?产妇年龄与足月时不良结局风险:一项基于人群的低风险初产妇登记研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 17;16:230. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1028-3.
3
Timing of elective cesarean delivery at term and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes among Thai and other Southeast Asian pregnant women.足月择期剖宫产的时机及其对泰国和其他东南亚孕妇母婴结局的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Aug;42(8):936-43. doi: 10.1111/jog.13016. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
4
Retrospective cohort study to investigate the impact of timing for term cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes.一项回顾性队列研究,旨在调查足月剖宫产时机对母婴结局的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Aug;32(16):2716-2720. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1447560. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
5
A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section.既往有剖宫产史的产妇在妊娠38周与39周择期剖宫产时自然分娩率的比较研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jul;99 Suppl 4:S37-41.
6
Timing of term elective cesarean section and adverse neonatal outcomes: A multi-center retrospective cohort study.择期剖宫产时机与不良新生儿结局的关系:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0249557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249557. eCollection 2021.
7
Timing of Repeat Cesarean Delivery for Women with a Prior Classical Incision.有先前经典剖宫产史的女性再次行剖宫产的时机。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 May;38(6):529-534. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718576. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
8
Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks.38周和39周择期剖宫产:新生儿及母体风险
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;27(2):121-7. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000158.
9
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.三胎妊娠中尝试经阴道分娩与计划剖宫产的母婴结局比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):493.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.054. Epub 2016 May 7.
10
Evaluation of neonatal outcomes in elective repeat cesarean delivery at term according to weeks of gestation.根据孕周评估足月择期再次剖宫产的新生儿结局。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013 Jan;39(1):105-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01951.x. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in the cesarean section rate in Korea (1982-2012) and a review of the associated factors.韩国剖宫产率的变化(1982 - 2012年)及相关因素综述
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Oct;29(10):1341-52. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.10.1341. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
2
Intra-operative complications increase with successive number of cesarean sections: Myth or fact?术中并发症会随着剖宫产次数的增加而增多:是误解还是事实?
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014 May;57(3):187-92. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.3.187. Epub 2014 May 15.
3
ACOG committee opinion no. 561: Nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries.
美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.561:非医学指征的早期分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):911-915. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000428649.57622.a7.
4
Neonatal respiratory morbidity in the early term delivery.足月早期产儿的呼吸系统并发症
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;207(4):292.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.022. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
5
Early term births: considerations in management.早产:处理要点。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;39(1):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2011.12.002. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
6
Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and maternal perioperative outcomes.择期在足月行剖宫产术的时机与产妇围手术期结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):280-286. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182078115.
7
Neonatal outcomes after demonstrated fetal lung maturity before 39 weeks of gestation.39 孕周前胎儿肺成熟后新生儿结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;116(6):1288-1295. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fb7ece.
8
Health implications resulting from the timing of elective cesarean delivery.择期剖宫产手术时机对健康的影响。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 Jun 21;8:68. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-68.
9
Second stage caesarean section at a tertiary hospital in South Africa.南非一家三级医院的二期剖宫产手术。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Oct;23(10):1151-5. doi: 10.3109/14767051003678002.
10
Risks for peroperative excessive blood loss in cesarean delivery.剖宫产术围手术期过度失血的风险。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 May;89(5):658-63. doi: 10.3109/00016341003605727.