Stadtspital Triemli, Zentrallabor, Birmensdorferstrasse 497, CH-8063 Zürich, Switzerland.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jun 21;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-60.
Protoporphyria (PP) resulting from two rare, inherited diseases of heme biosynthesis leads to dermal phototoxicity by accumulation of the heme precursor protoporphyrin IX. No standardized tools to quantify the degree of PP-related phototoxicity and its change by medical intervention have been published.
Results from a questionnaire completed by 17 affected individuals were used to determine the relative importance of two main components of PP-related phototoxicity, skin pain and sunlight exposure time, with respect to the effectiveness of any particular medical treatment.
Inter-rater reliability was 0.71 (n = 490), repeated estimates by four identical individuals showed high reproducibility (Slope = 1, intercept = 0, n = 136, Passing-Bablock).Six different models were developed, three of them showed good correlation with effectiveness estimates. Data from an unpublished trial indicated that the model with highest potential of responsiveness was the so called "Exposure times [multiplied by] Freedom from Pain" (ETFP). The minimal clinically important difference (MID) was 15 (10.2-20.4) ETFP scores, representing 28% of the standard deviation of the clinical trial data and 2.9% of its total range.
Among the six models proposed to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions in PP the ETFP model demonstrates the highest sensitivity using the existing data from a clinical trial of afamelanotide in PP. The results of this study have provided sufficient validation of the ETFP model that is likely to prove useful in future clinical trials.
由于两种罕见的血红素生物合成遗传性疾病导致的原卟啉症 (PP) 会使血红素前体原卟啉 IX 积累,从而导致皮肤光毒性。目前还没有发表用于量化 PP 相关光毒性程度及其通过医学干预改变的标准化工具。
使用 17 名受影响个体完成的问卷的结果,确定 PP 相关光毒性的两个主要组成部分(皮肤疼痛和阳光暴露时间)相对于任何特定医学治疗的有效性的相对重要性。
评分者间可靠性为 0.71(n = 490),四名相同个体的重复估计显示出高度可重复性(斜率 = 1,截距 = 0,n = 136,Passing-Bablock)。开发了六种不同的模型,其中三种模型与有效性估计具有良好的相关性。一项未发表试验的数据表明,具有最高响应潜力的模型是所谓的“暴露时间[乘以]无疼痛”(ETFP)。最小临床重要差异(MID)为 15(10.2-20.4)ETFP 评分,代表临床试验数据标准差的 28%和总范围的 2.9%。
在用于评估 PP 中治疗干预效果的六种模型中,使用 PP 中 afamelanotide 临床试验的现有数据,ETFP 模型显示出最高的敏感性。本研究的结果为 ETFP 模型提供了足够的验证,该模型可能在未来的临床试验中证明有用。