Kai Y, Morioka M, Yano S, Nakamura H, Makino K, Takeshima H, Hamada J, Kuratsu J
Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan -
Interv Neuroradiol. 2007 Mar 15;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):115-22. doi: 10.1177/15910199070130S117. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
External manual carotid compression is a non-invasive method to treat patients with cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulae (CSDAVF). We studied a group of patients with CSDAVF to identify factors that made cure by compression therapy possible. We treated 23 patients with CS-DAVF without cortical venous drainage or a recent decline in visual acuity by compression therapy. All were followed up by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at one, three, six, and 12 months after treatment and the characteristics of the imaging findings, their neurological symptoms, and the patterns of symptom improvement were examined. In group A (n=8), cure was achieved by manual carotid compression; in the other 15 patients (group B), cure was not obtained. Group B manifested significantly higher ocular pressure and a significantly longer interval between symptom onset and treatment by manual carotid compression. In group A, venous drainage was via the superior orbital vein (SOV) with/without involvement of the inferior petrosal sinus (IPS); closure of the CS-DAVF occurred within 4.1 months after the start of treatment. In three patients symptom improvement progressed steadily and gradually. The other five cured patients experienced transient worsening of their symptoms at two to four months after the start of treatment, these resolved within four to seven months. Manual carotid compression was effective in patients without retrograde venous CS-DAVF drainage or a severe decline in visual acuity. The factors that rendered cure by compression therapy possible were lower ocular pressure and a shorter interval between symptom onset and the start of treatment. Venous drainage in those patients was exclusively via the SOV without involvement of the IPS.
颈外动脉手法压迫是一种治疗海绵窦硬脑膜动静脉瘘(CSDAVF)患者的非侵入性方法。我们研究了一组CSDAVF患者,以确定使压迫治疗得以治愈的因素。我们对23例无皮质静脉引流或近期视力下降的CS-DAVF患者进行了压迫治疗。所有患者在治疗后1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月均接受磁共振血管造影(MRA)随访,并检查影像学表现特征、神经症状以及症状改善模式。A组(n = 8)通过颈外动脉手法压迫实现了治愈;在其他15例患者(B组)中,未实现治愈。B组表现出明显更高的眼压,且症状出现至颈外动脉手法压迫治疗的间隔时间明显更长。在A组中,静脉引流通过眶上静脉(SOV),伴或不伴有岩下窦(IPS)受累;CS-DAVF在治疗开始后4.1个月内闭合。3例患者症状改善稳定且逐渐进展。其他5例治愈患者在治疗开始后2至4个月出现症状短暂恶化,这些症状在4至7个月内消失。颈外动脉手法压迫对无逆行性静脉CS-DAVF引流或视力严重下降的患者有效。压迫治疗得以治愈的因素是眼压较低以及症状出现至治疗开始的间隔时间较短。这些患者的静脉引流仅通过SOV,无IPS受累。