Blackman Eric, Moore Candice, Hyatt John, Railton Richard, Frye Christian
AOTI, Ltd., Galway, Ireland & Unterhaching, Germany.
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010 Jun;56(6):24-31.
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are common, difficult-to-treat, and prone to complications. A prospective, controlled study was conducted to: 1) examine the clinical efficacy of a pressurized topical oxygen therapy (TWO(2)) device in outpatients (N = 28) with severe DFU referred for care to a community wound care clinic and 2) assess ulcer reoccurrence rates after 24 months. Seventeen (17) patients received TWO(2) five times per week (60-minute treatment, pressure cycles between 5 and 50 mb) and 11 selected a silver-containing dressing changed at least twice per week (control). Patient demographics did not differ between treatment groups but wounds in the treatment group were more severe, perhaps as a result of selection bias. Ulcer duration was longer in the treatment (mean 6.1 months, SD 5.8) than in the control group (mean 3.2 months, SD 0.4) and mean baseline wound area was 4.1 cm2 (SD 4.3) in the treatment and 1.4 cm2 (SD 0.6) in the control group (P = 0.02). Fourteen (14) of 17 ulcers (82.4%) in the treatment group and five of 11 ulcers (45.5%) in the control group healed after a median of 56 and 93 days, respectively (P = 0.04). No adverse events were observed and there was no reoccurrence at the ulcer site after 24 months' follow-up in either group. Although the absence of randomization and blinding may have under- or overestimated the treatment effect of either group, the significant differences in treatment outcomes confirm the potential benefits of TWO(2) in the management of difficult-to-heal DFUs. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness studies as well as studies to elucidate the mechanisms of action of TWO(2) are warranted.
糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)很常见,难以治疗,且容易引发并发症。开展了一项前瞻性对照研究,目的是:1)研究一种加压局部氧疗(TWO(2))设备对转诊至社区伤口护理诊所接受治疗的重度DFU门诊患者(N = 28)的临床疗效;2)评估24个月后的溃疡复发率。17名患者每周接受5次TWO(2)治疗(每次治疗60分钟,压力在5至50毫巴之间循环),11名患者选择每周至少更换两次含银敷料(对照组)。治疗组之间的患者人口统计学特征无差异,但治疗组的伤口更严重,这可能是选择偏倚的结果。治疗组的溃疡持续时间(平均6.1个月,标准差5.8)比对照组(平均3.2个月,标准差0.4)更长,治疗组的平均基线伤口面积为4.1平方厘米(标准差4.3),对照组为1.4平方厘米(标准差0.6)(P = 0.02)。治疗组17处溃疡中的14处(82.4%)和对照组11处溃疡中的5处(45.5%)分别在中位时间56天和93天后愈合(P = 0.04)。未观察到不良事件,两组在24个月的随访后溃疡部位均未复发。尽管缺乏随机分组和盲法可能低估或高估了任何一组的治疗效果,但治疗结果的显著差异证实了TWO(2)在治疗难愈合DFU方面的潜在益处。有必要开展临床疗效和成本效益研究以及阐明TWO(2)作用机制的研究。