Takeda Shuko, Sato Naoyuki, Rakugi Hiromi, Morishita Ryuichi
Department of Clinical Gene Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Mol Biosyst. 2010 Oct;6(10):1760-6. doi: 10.1039/c003148h. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
Alzheimer disease (AD), which is characterized by progressive cognitive and behavioral deficit, is the most common form of dementia. The incidence of AD is increasing at an alarming rate, and has become a major public health concern in many countries. It is well known that the onset of AD is preceded by a long preclinical period. It is thus critical to establish diagnostic biomarkers that can predict the risk of developing AD prior to clinical manifestation of dementia, for effective prevention and early intervention. With the emergence of potential promising approaches to treat AD targeting the beta-amyloid (Abeta) pathway, such as gamma-secretase inhibitors and vaccine therapy, there is an urgent need for such diagnostic markers. Although cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Abeta and tau protein levels are candidate biomarkers for AD, the invasive sampling procedure with associated complications limits their use in routine clinical practice. Plasma Abeta has been suggested as an inexpensive and non-invasive biomarker for AD. Although most previous cross-sectional studies on plasma Abeta level in humans failed to show a significant difference between individuals with AD compared to healthy older adults, many strategies are under investigation to improve the diagnostic potential of plasma Abeta. One promising approach is to modify the plasma Abeta level using some potential modulators. It is possible that a difference in plasma Abeta level might be unmasked by evaluating the response to stimulation by a modulator. Anti-Abeta antibody and Abeta binding proteins have been reported to be such modulators of plasma Abeta. In addition, the glucometabolic or hormonal status appears to modulate the plasma Abeta level. Our recent study has shown the possibility that glucose loading could be a novel simple strategy to modulate the plasma Abeta level, making it better suited for early diagnosis. This review summarizes the utility and limitations of current biomarkers of AD and discusses future strategies to improve the diagnostic potential of plasma Abeta.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是最常见的痴呆形式,其特征为进行性认知和行为缺陷。AD的发病率正以惊人的速度上升,已成为许多国家主要的公共卫生问题。众所周知,AD在发病前有很长的临床前期。因此,建立能够在痴呆临床表现之前预测AD发病风险的诊断生物标志物对于有效预防和早期干预至关重要。随着针对β-淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)途径治疗AD的潜在有前景方法的出现,如γ-分泌酶抑制剂和疫苗疗法,迫切需要此类诊断标志物。尽管脑脊液(CSF)中的Aβ和tau蛋白水平是AD的候选生物标志物,但侵入性采样程序及其相关并发症限制了它们在常规临床实践中的应用。血浆Aβ已被提议作为AD的一种廉价且非侵入性的生物标志物。尽管此前大多数关于人类血浆Aβ水平的横断面研究未能显示AD患者与健康老年人之间存在显著差异,但许多策略正在研究中以提高血浆Aβ的诊断潜力。一种有前景的方法是使用一些潜在的调节剂来改变血浆Aβ水平。通过评估对调节剂刺激的反应,可能会揭示出血浆Aβ水平的差异。据报道,抗Aβ抗体和Aβ结合蛋白是血浆Aβ的此类调节剂。此外,糖代谢或激素状态似乎也能调节血浆Aβ水平。我们最近的研究表明,葡萄糖负荷可能是一种调节血浆Aβ水平的新型简单策略,使其更适合早期诊断。本文综述了AD当前生物标志物的效用和局限性,并讨论了提高血浆Aβ诊断潜力的未来策略。